She's a Danger to the Republic

“Your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the federal government in significant ways in the most important time periods,” she told the lawyer representing Louisiana, Missouri and private plaintiffs.

“The government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country… by encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information,” she said.

This is a problem. Woke+Power=Fascist²

15 Likes

She clearly sees government as a God that is supposed to protect us. And to protect something you must be the master of it.

4 Likes

At least 5 other Justices side with Jackson and the Biden Administration. It will likely be at least a 6 to 3 outcome in favor of the Biden Administration.

1 Like

And you’re about to give all that glorious power to a Trump DoJ.

2 Likes

You do realize all this is about is hectoring and nothing more.

Enjoy the next few years if trump wins. No whining about something you are approving of the president doing now when it gets done to democrat voices in the future.

6 Likes

It’s funny that you think that he is a liberal.

He is a democrat. People can always out themselves. You’re coming to his defense just proves you are not telling the truth. Plus, in the past year he has shown us all just who he is.

@Safiel is the furthest thing from a Democrat.

Ask him his real feelings on unions and the FAA for example lol

2 Likes

The government isn’t concerned about the citizens whom they simply view as replaceable, all they are concerned about are protecting its power.

2 Likes

If the government was actually FORCING Twitter or Facebook to remove certain speech, that would be a major problem.

But they are merely COMMUNICATING with these platforms in a way several Justices and officials admitted is customary for government officials to communicate to the press.

Again, this could go anywhere from 6-3 to 8-1 in support of the Biden Administration. Justice Alito was the only Justice who gave any indication he was buying the challenger’s arguments.

This is not going to result in censorship.

It will just maintain the LONG status quo.

:smile:

Lemme find my Taft/Hartley t-shirt.

2 Likes

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

And those who lay with the dogs have fleas.

5 Likes

Ideological purity really does grow the party.

2 Likes

Which doesn’t change laying with dogs one bit.

We can say anything we choose as long as it’s government approved! Yay, free speech is protected! Thank you big brother…

4 Likes

just like colorado was right huh?

no

2 Likes

yes indeedy, the bill of rights do hamstring the feds and as matter of fact state governments.

duh. she just saying what the facts are.

the govt cannot run roughshod over the people we have the bill of rights.

Allan

1 Like

actually, she was complaining that the government would be hamstrung. Maybe reading in context ain’t your thing

2 Likes