Mo Brooks: Vote for Moore because conservatism is more important than child abuse

Page 1 of 14 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 329

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK, Norwich.
    Age
    33
    Posts
    37,237
    Rep Power
    20

    Default Mo Brooks: Vote for Moore because conservatism is more important than child abuse

    https://www.mediaite.com/online/rep-...n-allegations/

    “America faces huge challenges that are vastly more important than contested sexual allegations from four decades ago. Who will vote in America’s best interests on Supreme Court justices, deficit and debt, economic growth, border security, national defense, and the like? Socialist Democrat Doug Jones will vote wrong. Roy Moore will vote right. Hence, I will vote for Roy Moore.”

    -------------------------

    Modern American conservatism everybody. Who cares if he's a pedo, at least he's not a lib.

    Good luck with salvaging that party, and any semblance of respectability evangelicals might have once had.

  2. Sponsored Links


  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    38,590
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    While I don't find "Mo Brooks" (whoever that is) argument very compelling, I should just like to bring out that this is one more thread where the title is selling something fake compared to what is presented.
    Brennan on evidence of collusion: "I don't do evidence"

  4. Sponsored Links


  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK, Norwich.
    Age
    33
    Posts
    37,237
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DougBH View Post
    While I don't find "Mo Brooks" (whoever that is) argument very compelling, I should just like to bring out that this is one more thread where the title is selling something fake compared to what is presented.
    He's the Alabama Rep that ran against Moore and Strange in the primary.

    Isn't that essentially what he's arguing in his statement? Put aside the credibility of the accusations, because conservatism is too important.

  6. Sponsored Links


  7. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    38,590
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MoleUK View Post
    He's the Alabama Rep that ran against Moore and Strange in the primary.

    Isn't that essentially what he's arguing in his statement? Put aside the credibility of the accusations, because conservatism is too important.
    No, he is not arguing that conservatism is more important than child abuse. He is arguing that a couple of specific instances from 40 years ago where the statute of limitations is long gone and evidence is long past should not determine the direction of the country. He is not saying child abuse is henceforth ok because conservatism is more important.
    His is a losing argument, but it is not the argument you are claiming he is making.
    Brennan on evidence of collusion: "I don't do evidence"

  8. Sponsored Links


  9. Likes HeyJude liked this post
  10. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK, Norwich.
    Age
    33
    Posts
    37,237
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DougBH View Post
    No, he is not arguing that conservatism is more important than child abuse. He is arguing that a couple of specific instances from 40 years ago where the statute of limitations is long gone and evidence is long past should not determine the direction of the country. He is not saying child abuse is henceforth ok because conservatism is more important.
    His is a losing argument, but it is not the argument you are claiming he is making.
    Um..

    How is that not saying conservatism is more important than child abuse? The "direction of the country" is specifically in relation to conservatism v liberalism.

    "Roy Moore will vote right" "Socialist Democrat Doug Jones" He's framing it specifically in those terms.

  11. Sponsored Links


  12. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    38,590
    Rep Power
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MoleUK View Post
    Um..

    How is that not saying conservatism is more important than child abuse?
    I can't help you.
    Brennan on evidence of collusion: "I don't do evidence"

  13. Sponsored Links


  14. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    City of Champions!
    Posts
    134,741
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DougBH View Post
    No, he is not arguing that conservatism is more important than child abuse. He is arguing that a couple of specific instances from 40 years ago where the statute of limitations is long gone and evidence is long past should not determine the direction of the country. He is not saying child abuse is henceforth ok because conservatism is more important.
    His is a losing argument, but it is not the argument you are claiming he is making.
    So if enough time passes kiddie-fiddling is no big deal? Well hush my mouth.
    "Put your guap up, hot stuff, you're not tough/
    Let's play a game of Trouble and when I pop up/
    It's with the Glock tucked, crotched up in a drop ducked low."

  15. Sponsored Links


  16. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,960
    Rep Power
    8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gaetano "Tommy" Lucchese View Post
    So if enough time passes kiddie-fiddling is no big deal? Well hush my mouth.
    Yeah....I picked up on that tone too.

  17. Sponsored Links


  18. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    21,435
    Blog Entries
    5
    Rep Power
    13

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DougBH View Post
    No, he is not arguing that conservatism is more important than child abuse. He is arguing that a couple of specific instances from 40 years ago where the statute of limitations is long gone and evidence is long past should not determine the direction of the country. He is not saying child abuse is henceforth ok because conservatism is more important.
    His is a losing argument, but it is not the argument you are claiming he is making.
    wow thats fairly dishonest of you
    The beauty that is the ugliness of the right. " They demand accountability for anger and divisiveness, while holding themselves entirely unaccountable for their anger and divisiveness"

  19. Sponsored Links


  20. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bama Nation
    Posts
    77,358
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DougBH View Post
    No, he is not arguing that conservatism is more important than child abuse. He is arguing that a couple of specific instances from 40 years ago where the statute of limitations is long gone and evidence is long past should not determine the direction of the country. He is not saying child abuse is henceforth ok because conservatism is more important.
    His is a losing argument, but it is not the argument you are claiming he is making.
    I think it is a loser as well. I happen to know Mo. If this were a democrat he would be screaming bloody murder. I might disagree with Mo but I do not think he would support any kind of sexual abuse, especially on minor.
    “Wrinkles will only go where the smiles have been. ”
    ― Jimmy Buffett

  21. Sponsored Links


  22. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbo
    Posts
    43,829
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    When over 80% of those in prison, 90% of the homeless and 71% of HS dropouts come from fatherless homes, it exposes what's actually child abuse....if anybody really cares?

    https://thefatherlessgeneration.word...om/statistics/

  23. Sponsored Links


  24. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    23,524
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smyrna View Post
    When over 80% of those in prison, 90% of the homeless and 71% of HS dropouts come from fatherless homes, it exposes what's actually child abuse....if anybody really cares?

    https://thefatherlessgeneration.word...om/statistics/
    What's "actually" child abuse is a 30 something district attorney fondling children and who was apparently so well known for trying to pick up underage girls that he was banned from their local hang out spot.

    I'll give you a solid "B+" for the deflection attempt though.
    "I prefer someone who burns the flag and then wraps themselves up in the Constitution over someone who burns the Constitution and then wraps themselves up in the flag" - Molly Ivins

  25. Sponsored Links


  26. Likes party-free liked this post
  27. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    somewhere over the rainbo
    Posts
    43,829
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Excast View Post
    What's "actually" child abuse is a 30 something district attorney fondling children and who was apparently so well known for trying to pick up underage girls that he was banned from their local hang out spot.

    I'll give you a solid "B+" for the deflection attempt though.
    Then shame on all of those who were aware of this in the past and did NOTHING to stop it. Now, the motivation is purely political and I can't blindly support that.

  28. Sponsored Links


  29. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    3,783
    Rep Power
    14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smyrna View Post
    Then shame on all of those who were aware of this in the past and did NOTHING to stop it. Now, the motivation is purely political and I can't blindly support that.
    Being morally right has no statute of limitations.

    Not surprising you'll sell out your morality for a political party.
    "America's burden is that it wants to be loved, but knows it can't be." --- Tony Blair

  30. Sponsored Links


  31. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    UK, Norwich.
    Age
    33
    Posts
    37,237
    Rep Power
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smyrna View Post
    Then shame on all of those who were aware of this in the past and did NOTHING to stop it. Now, the motivation is purely political and I can't blindly support that.
    Is that what you think the motivation of these women is?

    How many times did the press approach them asking them to talk about their experiences in the past 30-40 years?

    Nobody asked, Smyrna. That's how these sick ****s get away with it for so long.

    But what can't you support? Either he's fit for office or not.
    Last edited by MoleUK; November 14th, 2017 at 11:13 am.

  32. Sponsored Links


Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •