-
July 28th, 2012, 12:04 am #16
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:05 am #17
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:11 am #18
From the original Fox News link:
The more I read, the more I am left with that conclusion that this Cook outfit is either incredivbly poorly managed or that they are simply lying through their teeth."The tax will not cause manufacturers to shift production overseas. The tax applies equally to imported and domestically produced devices, and devices produced in the United States for export are tax-exempt," the study said.
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...#ixzz21t3q7Asg
I am guessing the latter BTW.
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:12 am #19
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:12 am #20
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:14 am #21
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:14 am #22
War On String May Be Unwinnable, Says Cat General
General Bonkers....
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:25 am #23
Yeah, this sounds like a load of business generated hype and horse crap. They want to maximize their profits and I can understand that. Pretending a 2.5% tax will somehow block hundreds of new jobs and new factories sounds like a lie at face value. Who are they kidding, the medical industry is going to see increased sales with all the newly covered people in ACA.
"Inside every cynical person there is a disappointed idealist." George Carlin
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:35 am #24
Originally Posted by DougBH View Post
They do seem to be large, but a quick check of the internet doesn't show anything like that. Maybe a half or third of that percentage. Do you have a source for your percentage?
Ok. That explains the difference. The 64% is the gross margin, not the profit margin. It does not include administrative and selling costs in the calculation. These companies do have a very large profit margin compared to the much vilified oil companies, but not any 64%.
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:36 am #25
The tax is not even applied here, but let's say you're right. Rethink your math. A tax of 2.3 % is not half of your profit even it you only make 5% profit. Let's say your profit for the year is $100. A 2.3 % tax would be $2.30. Your profit is nowhere near cut in half, right?
The problem is too many people don't really understand how numbers, taxes, percentages, actually work.
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:43 am #26
-
July 28th, 2012, 12:55 am #27
Its very high for any business. 42% is what you're shooting for in any traditional manufacturing, and that's been a pipe dream for a long time.
The point is, a 2.3% tax is not killing any business, as the economics prof and succssfule investor and other capitalists on this thread are scoffing at. You gotta be some kinda simple to buy what this tripe article is selling. Which explains some things.^^this
-
July 28th, 2012, 1:38 am #28
-
July 28th, 2012, 11:31 am #29
Om nom nom...
Meanwhile back in the real world...
Indiana company scraps plans for expansion over ObamaCare device tax
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012...re-device-tax/
Cook Medical claims the tax on medical devices, set to take effect next year, will cost the company roughly $20 million a year, cutting into money that would otherwise go toward expanding into new facilities over the next five years.
-
July 28th, 2012, 11:43 am #30
Last edited by Billy_Bob; July 28th, 2012 at 11:46 am.
Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms of government those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.
Thomas Jefferson



Reply With Quote
How many of the four were coming out of a liquor store with a weapon and fifty dollars in cash? To the bold, no, I am dead set against it, because the abuse of such power has not been endemic to...
Obama Admin Admits to Killing Four...