PDA

View Full Version : Rove indicted.


Pages : 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Dreamy
June 4th, 2006, 3:16 pm
For openers, the 1986, Texas, gubernatorial election, Roves "bugged office" - ring any bells?

How about Rathergate? Has Rove all over it - plant a false document and then "discover" that it is false.

Can I prove the second one? Not yet. The first one? Fairly well documented.

Rove is a slimeball, employed by a slimeball, to aid a slimeball, political machine.

LOL Mike,you KNOW I will demand your evidence be presented to support the above charges. Are you sure you practice law? hehe:razz:

Liability
June 4th, 2006, 3:32 pm
Is OJ guilty or innocent? how about Clinton?

easy.

OJ was found not guilty.

But he did commit the murders.

Clintoon was not even charged with crimes. He was impeached, but not convicted.

On the other hand, he did lie under oath and did get sanctioned for it.

Was there any particular point you thought you were making, Fakey?

DiveCon
June 5th, 2006, 1:52 pm
bump

dont want Al to let this one slide off ;)

tha malcontent™
June 5th, 2006, 1:54 pm
Yeah, Karl Rove!...

Eh?...

I Love Bumping this Thread.

:)

peace...

GregMartin
June 5th, 2006, 2:19 pm
Any second now.





any second now.

EdKinOK
June 5th, 2006, 2:48 pm
Any second now.





any second now.

I cleared my calendar. I'm ready.

Liability
June 5th, 2006, 4:03 pm
This just in:

Fitzy scheduled a press conference to announce that he still has nothing to announce.

But the persecution, er, investigation is ongoing.

Blank film at 11:00!

Flakey Foont
June 5th, 2006, 4:07 pm
This just in:

Fitzy scheduled a press conference to announce that he stil has nothing to announce.

But the persecution, er, investigation is ongoing.

Blank film at 11:00!
persecution

Should criminals be "persecuted" to the fullest extent of the law?

Are you anti law enforcement or do you simply believe that no one in the Whitehouse is capable of unlawfulness?

DiveCon
June 5th, 2006, 4:33 pm
Should criminals be "persecuted" to the fullest extent of the law?

Are you anti law enforcement or do you simply believe that no one in the Whitehouse is capable of unlawfulness?

criminals should be "prosecuted" not "persecuted"
so far, it looks like only persecution going on because no prosecution is in line

express
June 5th, 2006, 4:34 pm
http://re2.mm-a1.yimg.com/image/184799872
Maybe it's one of those
Dean Wormer
double secret indictments.

Flakey Foont
June 5th, 2006, 4:38 pm
criminals should be "prosecuted" not "persecuted"
so far, it looks like only persecution going on because no prosecution is in line


Wouldn't they need a certain amount of persecution prior to prosecution?

DiveCon
June 5th, 2006, 4:40 pm
Wouldn't they need a certain amount of persecution prior to prosecution?

NO

Main Entry: per·se·cute [/URL]
Pronunciation: 'p&r-si-"kyüt
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): -cut·ed; -cut·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French persecuter, back-formation from persecuteur persecutor, from Late Latin persecutor, from persequi to persecute, from Latin, to pursue, from per- through + sequi to follow -- more at SUE (http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?persec01.wav=persecute'))
1 : to harass in a manner designed to injure, grieve, or afflict; specifically : to cause to suffer because of belief
2 : to annoy with persistent or urgent approaches (as attacks, pleas, or importunities) : PESTER (http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/pester)
synonym see WRONG (http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/wrong)
- per·se·cu·tee /"p&r-si-"kyü-'tE/ noun
- per·se·cu·tive (http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?persec02.wav=persecutee')) /'p&r-si-"kyü-tiv/ adjective
- per·se·cu·tor /-"kyü-t&r/ noun
- per·se·cu·to·ry [URL="http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?persec05.wav=persecutory')"] (http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?persec04.wav=persecutor')) /-kyü-"tOr-E, -"tor-; -"kyü-t&-rE/ adjective

Flakey Foont
June 5th, 2006, 4:44 pm
NO

Main Entry: per·se·cute [/URL]
Pronunciation: 'p&r-si-"kyüt
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): -cut·ed; -cut·ing
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French persecuter, back-formation from persecuteur persecutor, from Late Latin persecutor, from persequi to persecute, from Latin, to pursue, from per- through + sequi to follow -- more at SUE (http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?persec01.wav=persecute'))
1 : to harass in a manner designed to injure, grieve, or afflict; specifically : to cause to suffer because of belief
2 : to annoy with persistent or urgent approaches (as attacks, pleas, or importunities) : PESTER (http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/pester)
synonym see WRONG (http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/wrong)
- per·se·cu·tee /"p&r-si-"kyü-'tE/ noun
- per·se·cu·tive (http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?persec02.wav=persecutee')) /'p&r-si-"kyü-tiv/ adjective
- per·se·cu·tor /-"kyü-t&r/ noun
- per·se·cu·to·ry [URL="http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?persec05.wav=persecutory')"] (http://javascript<b></b>:popWin('/cgi-bin/audio.pl?persec04.wav=persecutor')) /-kyü-"tOr-E, -"tor-; -"kyü-t&-rE/ adjective


to harass in a manner designed to injure, grieve, or afflict

Isn't this exactly what is happeneing to the innocent Rove?

Liability
June 5th, 2006, 4:47 pm
Should criminals be "persecuted" to the fullest extent of the law?

Are you anti law enforcement or do you simply believe that no one in the Whitehouse is capable of unlawfulness?

Criminals should get prosecuted, not persecuted.

I am all for valid law enforcement.

And I know for a fact that people in the White House are capable of unlawfulness.

The Clintons lived there.

DiveCon
June 5th, 2006, 4:50 pm
Isn't this exactly what is happeneing to the innocent Rove?

that is exactly what IS happening, and it SHOULDNT BE

Flakey Foont
June 5th, 2006, 4:53 pm
that is exactly what IS happening, and it SHOULDNT BE


Why shouldn't it? because it's the Bush administration?

withoutfeathers
June 5th, 2006, 5:48 pm
This has been one of the leakiest grand jury investigations in the history of grandjury investigations yet not one word of Rove's supposed "squealing" has leaked out. In fact, not one reputable source has reported Rove's indictment. The only source for this is a thoroughly discredited left-wing rumor monger, Jason Leopold.

DiveCon
June 5th, 2006, 7:24 pm
Why shouldn't it? because it's the Bush administration?

are you saying that it SHOULD happen because its the bush administration?

Liability
June 5th, 2006, 10:30 pm
are you saying that it SHOULD happen because its the bush administration?

Who cares what that chump is saying -- or why?

He is a known quantity, now. Fakey is nothing but lying little troll.

DiveCon
June 5th, 2006, 10:48 pm
Who cares what that chump is saying -- or why?

He is a known quantity, now. Fakey is nothing but lying little troll.

yeah, i know

mmancil
June 5th, 2006, 10:49 pm
Nuthin' yet??

Shucks.

gdoane
June 5th, 2006, 10:53 pm
Nuthin' yet??

Shucks.

It's still a few more days to Friday. Gotta wait for it.

NightTrain
June 6th, 2006, 2:09 am
Nope... Not today...

But it's only Tuesday - the week is young....

Liability
June 6th, 2006, 9:53 am
Nope... Not today...

But it's only Tuesday - the week is young....

So was last week this time. This week will be no different.

It will get old. Friday will come and go.

Rove will have been indicted -- again -- a few more dozen times.

You know. The usual.

Liability
June 6th, 2006, 10:11 am
They will be asking this for years to come:

Where were you when you first heard the news that





Rove wasn't indicted?

gdoane
June 6th, 2006, 10:30 am
Do you think that if Rove isn't indicted that the libbies will pitch a Fitz?

Liability
June 6th, 2006, 10:31 am
Do you think that if Rove isn't indicted that the libbies will pitch a Fitz?

Of course.

In fact, I do believe that the Fitz pitching has already begun.

withoutfeathers
June 6th, 2006, 10:39 am
They will be asking this for years to come:

Where were you when you first heard the news that

Rove wasn't indicted?I remember it like it was yesterday -- guess it'll always be seared...seared in my mind -- I was sitting in front of my computer when suddenly, the word came across the cyber-waves: Rove Still Not Indicted! It sent an electric shock up my spine. I was stunned, in a daze. I couldn't move for 30, maybe 40 minutes. I knew from that moment on that we were living in a different world and things would never be the same...

Liability
June 6th, 2006, 12:01 pm
I remember it like it was yesterday -- guess it'll always be seared...seared in my mind -- I was sitting in front of my computer when suddenly, the word came across the cyber-waves: Rove Still Not Indicted! It sent an electric shock up my spine. I was stunned, in a daze. I couldn't move for 30, maybe 40 minutes. I knew from that moment on that we were living in a different world and things would never be the same...

I think your response has to be an award winner for its creative use of Lurch-isms, mixed mataphor category.

And, btw, that's a good thing! Kudos! :)

Liability
June 6th, 2006, 3:29 pm
Antennae are quivering.

Is this the day?

Is Rove about to get indicted --


again?

t-bird1963
June 6th, 2006, 3:31 pm
I think we need a counter for every day he dont get indicted but we are told it is coming. LOL

PeterGriffin
June 6th, 2006, 3:32 pm
Antennae are quivering.

Is this the day?

Is Rove about to get indicted --


again?

It's 6/6/06. Rove is already fully booked up today.

Liability
June 6th, 2006, 3:41 pm
It's 6/6/06. Rove is already fully booked up today.

666 is the number of the Beast according to Revelations.

It is not a date on the Gregorian calendar.

But you're partly right, I suppose.

Rove IS busy.

Is that why he keeps getting NOT indicted?

The "special" counsel is going easy on him because the man is just too busy?

Wow. I may have to start liking Fitzy, after all.

Patrick J. Fitzgerald. Isn't that eighteen letters? First, middle and last names; so, divide by three. Average = 6. 3 sets of 6 =

666.

Coincidence?

You be the judge.

GregMartin
June 6th, 2006, 3:45 pm
PeteOnTheGround!

LOL!

So funny!

express
June 6th, 2006, 8:55 pm
Is it soup yet?

GregMartin
June 7th, 2006, 1:13 am
Dunno bout soup but bigcorn says

ROVE INDICTED!






someday....

PeterGriffin
June 7th, 2006, 1:23 am
666 is the number of the Beast according to Revelations.

It is not a date on the Gregorian calendar.

But you're partly right, I suppose.

Rove IS busy.

Is that why he keeps getting NOT indicted?

The "special" counsel is going easy on him because the man is just too busy?

Wow. I may have to start liking Fitzy, after all.

Patrick J. Fitzgerald. Isn't that eighteen letters? First, middle and last names; so, divide by three. Average = 6. 3 sets of 6 =

666.

Coincidence?

You be the judge.


Yeah, I've kinda been pointing out the Gregorian calendar wasn't adopted until a bout a thousand years or so after the Bible was written, and that 6/6/06 isn't even really '666' for awhile now, not to mention how many scared, superstitious idiots this country has in it.

On that note: Ronald Wilson Reagan. 6 letters in each name, no fancy division (smells like Numerology, another tool of "THE DEVIL!") needed.

gdoane
June 7th, 2006, 3:06 am
Yeah, I've kinda been pointing out the Gregorian calendar wasn't adopted until a bout a thousand years or so after the Bible was written, and that 6/6/06 isn't even really '666' for awhile now, not to mention how many scared, superstitious idiots this country has in it.

On that note: Ronald Wilson Reagan. 6 letters in each name, no fancy division (smells like Numerology, another tool of "THE DEVIL!") needed.

The number referred to was named by people who were woefully unadept at math because they had no concept of the number "zero". That's why the 21st Century didn't start until 2001... there was no year "zero BC" because the contemporaries did not understand zero to be a number.

Therefore, the Number of The Beast is logically not 666... it's 667 when correcting for a well-known mathematically conceptual error at the time the Bible was written.

Think about it: There's no such thing as a Roman Numeral Zero. The concept of Zero wasn't even known in Europe until 900-1000 AD. Which means their math is off by one due to error.

Tomorrow is really the bad day.

Maybe Rove will be indicted??? :think:

Lego-Man
June 7th, 2006, 3:10 am
The number referred to was named by people who were woefully unadept at math because they had no concept of the number "zero". That's why the 21st Century didn't start until 2001... there was no year "zero BC" because the contemporaries did not understand zero to be a number.

Therefore, the Number of The Beast is logically not 666... it's 667 when correcting for a well-known mathematically conceptual error at the time the Bible was written.

Think about it: There's no such thing as a Roman Numeral Zero. The concept of Zero wasn't even known in Europe until 900-1000 AD. Which means their math is off by one due to error.

Tomorrow is really the bad day.

Maybe Rove will be indicted??? :think:

Gene, I heard that the number depends on the version of the Bible. It might be 616. In that case, it already passed. Going by the none use of "0", that might explain the criminal act against me on the third.

DiveCon
June 7th, 2006, 3:11 am
The number referred to was named by people who were woefully unadept at math because they had no concept of the number "zero". That's why the 21st Century didn't start until 2001... there was no year "zero BC" because the contemporaries did not understand zero to be a number.

Therefore, the Number of The Beast is logically not 666... it's 667 when correcting for a well-known mathematically conceptual error at the time the Bible was written.

Think about it: There's no such thing as a Roman Numeral Zero. The concept of Zero wasn't even known in Europe until 900-1000 AD. Which means their math is off by one due to error.

Tomorrow is really the bad day.

Maybe Rove will be indicted??? :think:

hence the stupidity of trying to place the "mark of the beast" with some man made timeline

gdoane
June 7th, 2006, 3:48 am
hence the stupidity of trying to place the "mark of the beast" with some man made timeline

As I understand the Prophesy, the deal is that there's a mark, something which identifies you as a member of the followers of "the beast" which is commonly assumed to be Beelzebub, The Lord of Flies, The Prince of Darkness, Satan or Mestopheles. Without this mark, you are ostracized by all, you cannot do business, cannot buy food, and will suffer greatly.

Sort of like a debit card but without the PIN number.

Anyway, it couldn't be a calendar because in all the years I've been shopping I've yet to actually need a calendar to score a TV Dinner with. It's not as if you're going to go to a cashier and get asked what day it is.

I think it's a reference to a willing sort of slavery the way it's written, but I can't see it being literal. I won't even put a bumper sticker oon my truck so the chances of me getting a tattoo or a "mark" are between slim and none and most guys I know are the same, they don't get tattoos or anything like that.

GregMartin
June 7th, 2006, 9:44 am
It says "the number of his name is 666"

homiebrah
June 7th, 2006, 9:46 am
indictment
indictment
indictment

GregMartin
June 7th, 2006, 9:55 am
Revelation 13:17 so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of his name. 18 This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.

Rev 13:18 hode esti sophia echo nous psephizo arithmos therion gar esti arithmos anthropos kai autos arithmos chi xi stigma

Blackrain
June 7th, 2006, 10:13 am
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.
:whistle: :think: :rolleyes:

mrclark
June 7th, 2006, 10:18 am
Originally Posted by biggestal
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.




:whistle: :think: :rolleyes:

Heh...did they ever run a retraction of that?:lol:

withoutfeathers
June 7th, 2006, 10:21 am
June 7, 2006: Day 890 since Special Counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald began his investigation into the possible leak of classified information regarding Valerie Plame-Wilson's employment at CIA headquarters in Langley Virginia.

Still no Rove indictment.

Blackrain
June 7th, 2006, 10:25 am
Heh...did they ever run a retraction of that?:lol:

I think they ran a quasi-retraction on truthout. Kind of a well, that's what our 'sources' said and it should happen regardless

Someone needs to start the story that Hillary's being indicted or censured by ethics committee

man, that'd be great

GregMartin
June 7th, 2006, 10:29 am
No dagummit. Bigstall says Rove was indicted so, garshdangit, Rove was indicted.

This daggone conservative news media just dont want to report it. Thas all. they jist ainta gonna report it.

Maelstrom
June 7th, 2006, 10:32 am
I didn't lie. I read the website just like you did. they said that rove
had been indicted not I. why kill the messenger, Marlin.
I was mislead. but that far from a liar, ass.


I believe this, from page 5, is as apologetic about his own gullibility and contrite as bggest gets.

GregMartin
June 7th, 2006, 10:36 am
Thats where he told me to stay far from his liar ass

withoutfeathers
June 7th, 2006, 10:50 am
I think they ran a quasi-retraction on truthout. Kind of a well, that's what our 'sources' said and it should happen regardless

Someone needs to start the story that Hillary's being indicted or censured by ethics committee

man, that'd be greatI hate the whole rumor-mill thing.

What next? Hillary Clinton had 15 year old girls over to the White House for private "meetings?"
http://www.gordonroland.com/images/Clinton%20and%20Cuthbert.jpg

Where will this end?

Liability
June 7th, 2006, 11:07 am
I hate the whole rumor-mill thing.

What next? Hillary Clinton had 15 year old girls over to the White House for private "meetings?"
http://www.gordonroland.com/images/Clinton%20and%20Cuthbert.jpg

Where will this end?

Now now. Even though it isn't actually being alleged, and mention (and photo) was only made to underscore a valid point still, there's

no reason to defame that once fifteen year old lass shown with the ugly old hag.

:razz:

By the way. The little girl was cute back then. I recall that she was (or still is?) a person of some fame.

Wasn't/isn't that Ms. Cuthbert?

gdoane
June 7th, 2006, 11:32 am
It says "the number of his name is 666"

That's what some of the translations say. Trusting their accuracy is a bit too much for my gullibility to take.

GregMartin
June 7th, 2006, 11:47 am
That's what some of the translations say. Trusting their accuracy is a bit too much for my gullibility to take.
"kai hina me tis dunamai agorazo e poleo ei me echo charagma e onoma therion e arithmos autos onoma."

Liability
June 7th, 2006, 11:49 am
That's what some of the translations say. Trusting their accuracy is a bit too much for my gullibility to take.

I just heard again yesterday that the old Hebrew alphabet had a number corresponding with each letter. I had heard this before from some of my more studious and devout Jewish friends.

It is a concept that is related to the Kabalah and also somewhat related to the book popular a few years back called The Bible Code.

In any event, the "reverend" who was yakking about it on some radio show, yesterday, said that, in Hebrew, the name that corresponds with the number 666 is also the name of the "fifth Buddha" and that this person is (or will be) none other than THE antiChrist.

I can't recall the name.

I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter, anyway.

withoutfeathers
June 7th, 2006, 12:12 pm
Now now. Even though it isn't actually being alleged, and mention (and photo) was only made to underscore a valid point still, there's

no reason to defame that once fifteen year old lass shown with the ugly old hag.

:razz:

By the way. The little girl was cute back then. I recall that she was (or still is?) a person of some fame.

Wasn't/isn't that Ms. Cuthbert?That is, indeed, the delicious Elisha! :drool:

And, yes, of course I'm only trying to underscore the point about how easy it is to make insinuations with nothing more than a photograph of an adult woman with her arm around a 15 year old girl unrelated to her.

Just as I wouldn't make an allegation against Karl Rove until someone actually comes up with some evidence of wrong-doing, I wouldn't suggest anything inappropriate about a (then) 50 year old woman inviting unrelated 15 year old girls to her home for "private meetings."

Liability
June 7th, 2006, 3:14 pm
Since BigOldAl's thread is clearly the only meaningful thing worthy of discussion here today, it strikes me as odd -- to the point of being painful -- that this thread is not getting MUCH more attention. Why is that, I wonder?

Where are our intrepid reporters?

I just Googled "Rove Indictment" and discovered --

well, not much of anything, actually. But, that's not the point. For, as we all must know by know, it's all about 'the seriousness of the charges'!

This must be one of them super double top-secret eyes only indictments.

Why is the truth being suppressed?

DiveCon
June 7th, 2006, 3:16 pm
no fitzmas yet ;)

EdKinOK
June 7th, 2006, 3:18 pm
Since BigOldAl's thread is clearly the only meaningful thing worthy of discussion here today, it strikes me as odd -- to the point of being painful -- that this thread is not getting MUCH more attention. Why is that, I wonder?

Where are our intrepid reporters?

I just Googled "Rove Indictment" and discovered --

well, not much of anything, actually. But, that's not the point. For, as we all must know by know, it's all about 'the seriousness of the charges'!

This must be one of them super double top-secret eyes only indictments.

Why is the truth being suppressed?

It's those damned Bush lapdogs in "corporate media."

mmancil
June 7th, 2006, 6:26 pm
no fitzmas yet ;)

Guess not.

Mike88
June 7th, 2006, 6:32 pm
I just heard again yesterday that the old Hebrew alphabet had a number corresponding with each letter. I had heard this before from some of my more studious and devout Jewish friends.

It is a concept that is related to the Kabalah and also somewhat related to the book popular a few years back called The Bible Code.

In any event, the "reverend" who was yakking about it on some radio show, yesterday, said that, in Hebrew, the name that corresponds with the number 666 is also the name of the "fifth Buddha" and that this person is (or will be) none other than THE antiChrist.

I can't recall the name.

I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter, anyway.

It is Qabbalah, which is an ancient celebration of the ability to communicate our thoughts via numbers, letters, and sounds. This is baiscially all there is to it. You can always tell a chump by their answer to what the Qabbalah is. If they claim, like Madonna, to be Qabbalistic scholars, and they tell you anything other than what I explained above, then they are chumps who have been taken for a ride.

Also, 666 is NOT the number of the "therion". 666 is an ancient solar symbol that is based upon a number square. You take a sqaure, and divide it up into 6x6 smaller ones. The numbers from 1 to 36 (6 squared) can be arranged in the 36 boxes so that all columsn and all rows add to 111. Add up the rows, and you get 666. Add up the columns, and you get 666.

NightTrain
June 8th, 2006, 1:58 am
Nothing today...

Maybe tomorrow...

Possibly Friday...

DiveCon
June 8th, 2006, 2:05 am
yup, tomorrow is another fitzmas eve
the libs will be all giddy ;)

gdoane
June 8th, 2006, 2:16 am
You do realize that if Rove gets indicted that John Kerry is President, right?

Yeah, it's ridiculous but it's the only thing that explains why there's a drive to get Rove indicted.

The object isn't even winning anymore.

There's absolutely NOTHING that could possibly happen to Karl Rove which would get Bush43 re-elected.

It's a don't-care.

The liberals

Nashville
June 8th, 2006, 4:58 am
Not so fast. Who said Bush 43 cannot be re-elected? This is Rove we're talking about, remember?

It's the knowledge of Rove's genius, of course that drives the indictment frenzy. They sense it. They fear it.

The next masterstroke, in the works. He manages to convince the Dems through this elaborate Rovelian scheme including Bush's low poll numbers, "culture of corruption," collapse of the Republican Party blah, blah, blah, etc. that they are certain of winning the Whitehouse and everything else. They become so self assured and convinced of total victory and control, that they begin a strong drive for repeal of the 22nd amendment, to be able to either bring back Billy or simply improve the chances of their own longevity.

Of course since this is an elaborate conspiracy, all Republicans are in on it (secrets are well kept only within conspiracies, for some reason). Anyway, this flies through the House and Senate, and all the hoops and suddenly we have a ratified amendment, removing presidential term limits. Then Rove with exquisite timing, releases all the stuff he's been holding in his back pocket. Bin laden gets captured (officially), Iraq's undisputable success schedule is moved up, there's a huge sandstorm in the Iraqi desert and WMD stockpiles are exposed and discovered independently by a French news team and reported, Bush says no way to amnesty of any sort for illegals, he vetoes some spending bills, Senate Republicans find their backbone, we skip a hurricane season, a video comes out showing Hillary screaming all sorts of racial and other hateful epitaphs at Bill, and finally, finally, Kerry's full military records "leak out" and it makes it look like, if anything, the Swifties were holding back.

So Bush runs again, and thanks to Rove's intricate and flawless plan, wins with 507 electoral votes.

This is why the irrational drive to indict Rove. It's the knowledge and fear of the power and genius of the man.

Blue Collar
June 8th, 2006, 5:05 am
You do realize that if Rove gets indicted that John Kerry is President, right?

Yeah, it's ridiculous but it's the only thing that explains why there's a drive to get Rove indicted.

The object isn't even winning anymore.

There's absolutely NOTHING that could possibly happen to Karl Rove which would get Bush43 re-elected.

It's a don't-care.

The liberalsSuch compassion for the embattled fat boy. And here I thought you liked Karl.

DiveCon
June 8th, 2006, 5:08 am
Such compassion for the embattled fat boy. And here I thought you liked Karl.

who cares

Zarqawi is DEAD
:dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:

Mr. M
June 8th, 2006, 6:01 am
who cares

Zarqawi is DEAD
:dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:
Damn and Fitz was just about to indict him too...

gdoane
June 8th, 2006, 9:34 am
Such compassion for the embattled fat boy. And here I thought you liked Karl.

Embattled?

What, from stupid liberals poking at him like supermarket lobsters with rubberbands on their claws?

That's what liberals call "embattled?" The attack of the supermarket lobster? A pathetic useless attack by a bug out of water?

Don't worry, supermarket lobster attacks are always rewarded well. A nice hot bath, garlic, butter, a dinner invitation, it's almost like a date except nobody ever kisses the supermarket lobster.

We're going to ruin your supermarket lobster. Fitzgerald is never going to work in D.C. again, I hope he has his resume prepared because he's going to be a Wal*Mart greeter for the rest of his days checking receipts at the exit.

The rubberbands are not ever going to come off of the claws of the supermarket lobster until the drawn butter is good and ready.

The supermarket lobsters can't do anything to Rove. They're idiots for trying. If he's indicted on Friday, he'll be pardoned on Monday. The supermarket lobster is stupid enough to go after the right-hand-man of a sitting lame duck President and he doesn't smell the pardon coming from a mile away??

The water is boiling. The butter is drawn. Attack, supermarket lobster. It's funny.

Blue Collar
June 8th, 2006, 9:39 am
Embattled?

What, from stupid liberals poking at him like supermarket lobsters with rubberbands on their claws?

That's what liberals call "embattled?" The attack of the supermarket lobster? A pathetic useless attack by a bug out of water?

Don't worry, supermarket lobster attacks are always rewarded well. A nice hot bath, garlic, butter, a dinner invitation, it's almost like a date except nobody ever kisses the supermarket lobster.

We're going to ruin your supermarket lobster. Fitzgerald is never going to work in D.C. again, I hope he has his resume prepared because he's going to be a Wal*Mart greeter for the rest of his days checking receipts at the exit.

The rubberbands are not ever going to come off of the claws of the supermarket lobster until the drawn butter is good and ready.

The supermarket lobsters can't do anything to Rove. They're idiots for trying. If he's indicted on Friday, he'll be pardoned on Monday. The supermarket lobster is stupid enough to go after the right-hand-man of a sitting lame duck President and he doesn't smell the pardon coming from a mile away??

The water is boiling. The butter is drawn. Attack, supermarket lobster. It's funny.Almost as funny as your contempt for Karl Rove. The issue wasn't the nature of his circumstance but the fact that you expressed "not caring".

But you go right ahead and play to the audience who you seem always to feel are watching. I'll let you have the last word in the comforting knowledge between the two of us ... that you have no respect for Karl.

gdoane
June 8th, 2006, 10:10 am
Almost as funny as your contempt for Karl Rove. The issue wasn't the nature of his circumstance but the fact that you expressed "not caring".

But you go right ahead and play to the audience who you seem always to feel are watching. I'll let you have the last word in the comforting knowledge between the two of us ... that you have no respect for Karl.

I have no respect for any politician. There's no politician in the world today that I would break bread with. They're all a bunch of bastards taking taxes from me and giving NOTHING in return. Politicians hurt a hundred people for every one person they help when they tax money away for idiocy like welfare and medicaid. It's better that one person suffer alone than having 100 people forced to suffer with the idiot.

Rush Limbaugh says he couldn't be a politician because he couldn't do the evil things that politicians do, running around glad-handing people for their money and their votes (but mostly their money).

If you name the most evil men in history, the most murderous villains, the six-digit killers with more than 100,000 deaths associated with them, who are they?

Lenin.
Stalin.
Hitler.
Ho Chi Minh.
Castro.
Hirohito.
Pol Pot.

Who are they?? POLITICIANS, that's who they are. You have to be EVIL to be a politician because government is an EVIL. It's a necessary evil, but no component of it is good because good cannot be attracted to evil. Only evil is attracted to evil which is why politicians must by nature be inherently evil men.

They're all bad people. A good man would never choose that vile line of work.

misterfine
June 8th, 2006, 10:13 am
Who are they?? POLITICIANS, that's who they are. You have to be EVIL to be a politician because government is an EVIL. It's a necessary evil, but no component of it is good because good cannot be attracted to evil. Only evil is attracted to evil which is why politicians must by nature be inherently evil men.

They're all bad people. A good man would never choose that vile line of work.

I agree that politicians are good, but your example doesn't hold up. Of course they're all politicians. Nobody can kill 100,000 people by themselves. They need an army, and to have an army it usually means you need to be the head of a country.

GregMartin
June 8th, 2006, 10:17 am
Wow. Zarawi dead, Rove NOT indicted --- AGAIN.
Bad day for the libtard loser seditious America hating traitors.

gdoane
June 8th, 2006, 10:50 am
I agree that politicians are good, but your example doesn't hold up. Of course they're all politicians. Nobody can kill 100,000 people by themselves. They need an army, and to have an army it usually means you need to be the head of a country.

I don't follow your logic. The Army is a weapon. The politicians sought that weapon out and used it to kill.

How the killer gets the weapon is immaterial. A gun in the hands of a good man will not be used to kill innocent people, but that gun in the hands of a bad man will be.

Can you name the last American President who never deployed American hostile forces in a sovereign nation?

Bush43? Iraq War, Afghanistan
Clinton? Somalia, Missile Launches to manipulate newspaper headlines.
Bush41? Persian Gulf War
Reagan? Grenada invasion
Carter? Downed helicopter in Iran
Ford? Doesn't count, he wasn't elected and he was an idiot anyway.
Nixon? Vietnam.
LBJ? Vietnam.
Kennedy? Cuban Missile Crisis, Bay of Pigs.

Politicians seek power over armies for the same reason a murderer seeks out a gun. It's just a tool to make real the blackest hopes in the darkest corner of their evil minds.

DiveCon
June 8th, 2006, 1:35 pm
I agree that politicians are good, but your example doesn't hold up. Of course they're all politicians. Nobody can kill 100,000 people by themselves. They need an army, and to have an army it usually means you need to be the head of a country.

you STILL believe that idiotic Lancet Report?
:)):))

GregMartin
June 9th, 2006, 10:14 am
IT'S FRIDAY!

Happy Indictment day!

Lets all sing Fitzmas songs around the Rove Bush

gdoane
June 9th, 2006, 10:19 am
IT'S FRIDAY!

Happy Indictment day!

Lets all sing Fitzmas songs around the Rove Bush

Too close to Juneteenth (June 19th), the anniversary of the day when slaves of Texans were freed from bondage. A Rove indictment on that day would be too full of irony for a liberal elite to pass up concerning an indictment aimed at the Administration of a former Texas Governor like Dubya.

Darth AirBorne
June 9th, 2006, 10:21 am
Are we back to these liberal day Dream Threads again??

Man!! Bring back the " Come ON NOW ROVE!!." Threads!!

HiHo!!

gdoane
June 9th, 2006, 11:07 am
Are we back to these liberal day Dream Threads again??

Man!! Bring back the " Come ON NOW ROVE!!." Threads!!

HiHo!!

Welcome to 21st Century Liberalism. It's liberalism where:

Every election won by a conservative is "stolen" and must be investigated.
Every meeting between an elected official and his friend in "corruption" and must be investigated.
It's not about the nature of the evidence, it's the seriousness of the charge.
States with Republican Governors electing Republican Presidents are surely proof the will of the people has been trampled.
Courtrooms are best used as places to cure voter stupidity.
Indictments no longer carry a presumption of innocence if the indictee is a Republican.
Illegal Aliens are "Undocumented Immigrants".
Terrorists are "Insurgents".
Bums are "Homeless".
Taxes are "Revenues".

Rick12341
June 9th, 2006, 11:17 am
I don't follow your logic. The Army is a weapon. The politicians sought that weapon out and used it to kill.

How the killer gets the weapon is immaterial. A gun in the hands of a good man will not be used to kill innocent people, but that gun in the hands of a bad man will be.

Can you name the last American President who never deployed American hostile forces in a sovereign nation?

Bush43? Iraq War, Afghanistan
Clinton? Somalia, Missile Launches to manipulate newspaper headlines.
Bush41? Persian Gulf War
Reagan? Grenada invasion
Carter? Downed helicopter in Iran
Ford? Doesn't count, he wasn't elected and he was an idiot anyway.
Nixon? Vietnam.
LBJ? Vietnam.
Kennedy? Cuban Missile Crisis, Bay of Pigs.

Politicians seek power over armies for the same reason a murderer seeks out a gun. It's just a tool to make real the blackest hopes in the darkest corner of their evil minds.

With that kind of logic I guess we should have syated out of WW1, WW2 and korea????

gdoane
June 9th, 2006, 11:30 am
With that kind of logic I guess we should have syated out of WW1, WW2 and korea????

Yeah, we should have. France and England have allied with Germany and want to use a common currency now with them anyway so what the heck was accomplished?

Nothing. Absolutely nothing.

Oh sure, if we hadn't helped France they'd hate us, but they do that anyway so what? A pox on them.

DiveCon
June 9th, 2006, 12:43 pm
Too close to Juneteenth (June 19th), the anniversary of the day when slaves of Texans were freed from bondage. A Rove indictment on that day would be too full of irony for a liberal elite to pass up concerning an indictment aimed at the Administration of a former Texas Governor like Dubya.

not completely correct
its the aniversary for when the slaves found out about them being freed, it was almost a year after it actually happened

Liability
June 9th, 2006, 12:47 pm
I hate to get back to the topic (croup will love it that this IS a lib bashing thread in which I gleefully participate) but --

it's time for THE POP QUIZ. I hope you've all been studying.


1. How many times has Mr. Rove been indicted, to date?

2. On which indictment was Mr. Rove charged with the most serious crimes?

3. On which indictment was Mr. Rove charged with the largest individual number of crimes?

4. How many times has Mr. Rove been indicted for "perjury?"

5. How many times has Mr. Rove been indicted for "obstruction of justice?"

6. How many times has Mr. Rove been indicted for lying to a federal officer?

7. How many times has Mr. Rove been indicted on a Friday?

8. How many times has Mr. Rove been required to surrender himself?


Bonus Questions. For extra points:


9. How did Mr. Rove manage to "out" a covert agent who was not, in fact, covert?

10. What reason(s) did Mr. Rove have to orchestrate the "outing" of a non-covert agent and why was it "necessary" to lie about the planning and commission of a non crime?

Liability
June 9th, 2006, 7:27 pm
This is an official What the Hell BUMP just because nobody has tried to hand in their Pop Quiz!

I see some summer school coming up for some of you!

:)

EdKinOK
June 9th, 2006, 8:19 pm
This is an official What the Hell BUMP just because nobody has tried to hand in their Pop Quiz!

I see some summer school coming up for some of you!

:)

Can I get a spanking instead of summer school?

I love question #7. :)

And since today is Friday and therefore an anniversary of sorts......BUMP

DiveCon
June 9th, 2006, 10:19 pm
WHAT?!?!?!?!

no fitzmas AGAIN
:((

Flakey Foont
June 9th, 2006, 10:23 pm
I'm starting to think Divecon and Liability are having unnatural fantasies about Rove

http://www.tart.org/ilovekarlrove/archives/250_ilk.gif

DiveCon
June 9th, 2006, 10:27 pm
I'm starting to think Divecon and Liability are having unnatural fantasies about Rove

http://www.tart.org/ilovekarlrove/archives/250_ilk.gif

thats YOU
your the one fixated on Rove being indicted

GregMartin
June 9th, 2006, 10:31 pm
Dang! Forgot to plug in the rove bush.
There now, aint it purdy?

Newtan08
June 9th, 2006, 10:46 pm
Too close to Juneteenth (June 19th), the anniversary of the day when slaves of Texans were freed from bondage. A Rove indictment on that day would be too full of irony for a liberal elite to pass up concerning an indictment aimed at the Administration of a former Texas Governor like Dubya.


not completely correct
its the aniversary for when the slaves found out about them being freed, it was almost a year after it actually happened

I thought Juneteenth wasnt really a day so much as it was the time around when they heard they were freed.

no one really knew when they were freed, so they all agreed on juneteenth

Dreamy
June 9th, 2006, 11:00 pm
This thread is such a needed reminder on why one should never be a liberal.

Rove indicted! http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Dreamy2/Dreamy3/365.gif

Flakey Foont
June 9th, 2006, 11:09 pm
This thread is such a needed reminder on why one should never be a liberal.

Rove indicted! http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Dreamy2/Dreamy3/365.gif


So since rove hasn't been indicted, people shouldn't be liberals? If rove was indicted does does that mean people should be liberals?

Dreamy
June 9th, 2006, 11:14 pm
So since rove hasn't been indicted, people shouldn't be liberals? If rove was indicted does does that mean people should be liberals?

This thread is a constant reminder of how gullible of the media one must be to be a liberal. You live and die by what the media tells you. And at times the enemy has sold you a line of propaganda BS and many of you lap it up.

The latest example? Haditha.

NightTrain
June 10th, 2006, 12:20 am
I'm starting to think Divecon and Liability are having unnatural fantasies about Rove

http://www.tart.org/ilovekarlrove/archives/250_ilk.gif
You should be careful about posting pictures from the internet...

so... How long have you been a member of tart.org?

:))


Merry Fitzmas!

Dreamy
June 10th, 2006, 12:34 am
You should be careful about posting pictures from the internet...

so... How long have you been a member of tart.org?

:))


Merry Fitzmas!

:))

Liability
June 10th, 2006, 10:37 am
thats YOU [Fakey]
your the one fixated on Rove being indicted

KO-Rekt!

homiebrah
June 10th, 2006, 10:52 am
You should be careful about posting pictures from the internet...

so... How long have you been a member of tart.org?

:))


Merry Fitzmas!

Yeah, he got his ass owned the last time he did that. I think what Flakey has is a deep fetish for Rove. It's bordering on sick.

lsue
June 10th, 2006, 10:57 am
Bump for Rove! Any indictment yet??? (Somebody has KoolAid stains
on their widdle wips, huh?) LOL!

Darkwind
June 10th, 2006, 11:21 am
Any minute now..


<best British voice> Wait for it....

GregMartin
June 10th, 2006, 12:58 pm
EVERYBODY SING!

Si-i-lent night, In-dict-ment night
Rove is calm, Jumpsuit is bright
rond yon pot-belly, Republican child
Beats the democRats, wussies get riled
dream on libtards in pe-eace
drea-eam on lib-tards in peace.

DiveCon
June 10th, 2006, 1:01 pm
another week goes by, and yet STILL no Fitzmas
no joy in lib-ville

GregMartin
June 10th, 2006, 1:10 pm
Have a holly-jolly fitzmas
e'en if it doesn't come this year
I don't know if Wilson's lies will grow
if so, well then we'll cheer
Have a holly-jolly fitzmas
and in case it's not this year
Oh by golly have a holly jolly fitzmas
next year

Xena
June 10th, 2006, 1:20 pm
Greg - :))

gdoane
June 10th, 2006, 1:43 pm
So since rove hasn't been indicted, people shouldn't be liberals? If rove was indicted does does that mean people should be liberals?

Nobody should be a liberal. Being a liberal shows a gross lack of a natural sense of self-preservation which should be inherent in all life forms and lacking that sense should be proof than liberalism is a mental illness.

How do liberals show such a lack of self-preservation?

They want to be taxed, reducing their own survival resources.
They want politicians in charge of health care, not doctors and patients.
They want to be forced to drive teensy econobox deathtrap excuses for cars.
They want our national defense forces placed in the hands of our enemies in the U.N.
They want to tax businesses to death so nobody has a place to go find work.
They want that we should wait for our enemies to have WMD's before we prevent them from getting WMD's.
They claim to want peace and elect warmongers including the only man to use Nuclear Weapons in War.

Indictments mean nothing. You can indict a ham sandwich, as the saying goes, and the main reason liberals rejoice over indictments for Republicans is because Republicans have a base who will demand that, like Nixon, even an impending indictment is cause enough to demand stepping down.

Liberals can be impeached, like Clinton was, and the no-moral-standards liberals will stick by their guy no matter how dirty he is.

People do see that double standard. If Rove is indicted (he won't be) then he'll resign in 20 seconds flat, which is what that pathetic worthless parasite Clinton should have done but he didn't have the character or class to put the needs of the nation above himself. Clinton doesn't care about America, Clinton cares about Clinton and nothing else.

express
June 10th, 2006, 4:10 pm
An indictment sighting was reported earlier this morning just off the coast of Tampa, Florida. But it turned out to me an amorous mantee rubbing up against a weather bouy.... False alarm...

dave818
June 10th, 2006, 6:38 pm
bump for libs

dave818
June 10th, 2006, 10:44 pm
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.


owned

cyph3r7
June 11th, 2006, 12:03 am
Merry Fitzmas!!!!

oh wait...libs get coal again

GregMartin
June 11th, 2006, 12:35 am
In-dict Rove for Fitzmas
lib-tards jump with glee
Cheney, Snow,
and Bush must go
for plame it's plain to see
Fitzmas Friday finds me
where the frog march sees
Indict Rove for Fitzmas
libtardies only dream

gb2004
June 11th, 2006, 12:36 am
An indictment sighting was reported earlier this morning just off the coast of Tampa, Florida. But it turned out to me an amorous mantee rubbing up against a weather bouy.... False alarm...


:)) :)) :))

NightTrain
June 11th, 2006, 1:19 am
In-dict Rove for Fitzmas
lib-tards jump with glee
Cheney, Snow,
and Bush must go
for plame it's plain to see
Fitzmas Friday finds me
where the frog march sees
Indict Rove for Fitzmas
libtardies only dream

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v198/darth_nighttrain/gmfitzmas.jpg

dave818
June 11th, 2006, 9:18 pm
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.


owned

gb2004
June 11th, 2006, 10:22 pm
You know, we really should cut bigg some slack. What he meant to post was "Rove invited"

You, know......like to a party. Yeah, that's the ticket.:))

GregMartin
June 11th, 2006, 11:46 pm
It came upon a Friday clear
That glorious indictment of old
With Roves face bending near the earth
To hide those chains worth gold
Peace on the earth good times for libs
Fitzpatrick's our gracious king
Repubs in silent stillness lay
and all the libtards sing

GregMartin
June 12th, 2006, 10:37 pm
Joy to the world
Indictments come
Let Rove receive his sting
Let every Republican
share part of his cell room
and dems and libtards sing
and dems and libtards sing
and de-ems and de-e-ems and lib-tards sing.

GregMartin
June 12th, 2006, 11:08 pm
Rove ruled the world
With ruthless grace
Made George the nation's king
The glory of
His indictment
Hope he gets the rubber glove
Hope he gets the rubber glove
Hope he ge-ets he ge-e-ets the rubber glove

GregMartin
June 12th, 2006, 11:39 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v198/darth_nighttrain/gmfitzmas.jpg
GregMartin and the Moron Slobberknocker Choir

cyph3r7
June 13th, 2006, 8:18 am
NEWS FLASH!! NEWS FLASH!! Rove to be indicted!!!

Wait...I misread the title

Prosecutors inform Rove he won't be charged in CIA leak case




swapContent('firstHeader','applyHeader');WASHINGTO N (AP) — Top White House aide Karl Rove has been told by prosecutors he won't be charged with any crimes in the investigation into leak of a CIA officer's identity, his lawyer said Tuesday.
Attorney Robert Luskin said that special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald informed him of the decision on Monday, ending months of speculation about the fate of one of President Bush's closest advisers. Rove testified five times before a grand jury.
Fitzgerald has already secured a criminal indictment against Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.
"On June 12, 2006, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald formally advised us that he does not anticipate seeking charges against Karl Rove," Luskin said in a statement.
Copyright 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2006-06-13-rove-cia_x.htm

It's a bad day for libs...bad week actually

commentary: BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH HH

Ex_Spy_Guy
June 13th, 2006, 8:22 am
2nd wave:

http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/06/13/america/web.0613rove.php

Xena
June 13th, 2006, 8:26 am
This must be a vewwy sad day for the haters. :dance:

homiebrah
June 13th, 2006, 8:27 am
This should shut Flakey the hell up.

olympian2004
June 13th, 2006, 8:28 am
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.

You were wrong as usual.

---

CountryGirl
June 13th, 2006, 8:29 am
How's that "Culture of Corruption" slogan working out these days???

Might want to put that slogan on ice . . . right next to Jefferson's cold cash.

cyph3r7
June 13th, 2006, 8:34 am
This should shut Flakey the hell up.

you kidding me? He can't be a real person. Meaning he has to be a DU or DNC plant. No way someone is really that stupid. Darwinism would have taken care of that years ago.

cyph3r7
June 13th, 2006, 8:37 am
http://www.monkeysvsrobots.com/mvsrpm/images/music/hoganbootband3.jpg

CAN YOU HEAR THAT??

Libs waking up today and watching Fox News.....screams can be heard off in the distance

Lord of Mirrors
June 13th, 2006, 8:49 am
How can they compete? When Rove is just.....

Too......

SWEET!

I feel SO sorry for Biggest Tool.... He was SO counting on this, like the little boy wanting a train for christmas, and only got a bowtie!

cyph3r7
June 13th, 2006, 8:52 am
Joe Wilson upon watching the news this morning:

http://www.thediabetesblog.com/images/2005/12/baby%20crying.jpg

bella-day
June 13th, 2006, 8:57 am
How can they compete? When Rove is just.....

Too......

SWEET!

I feel SO sorry for Biggest Tool.... He was SO counting on this, like the little boy wanting a train for christmas, and only got a bowtie!


More like the box the bowtie should have been in!:mrgreen:

sgtmac_46
June 13th, 2006, 8:59 am
Joe Wilson upon watching the news this morning:

http://www.thediabetesblog.com/images/2005/12/baby%20crying.jpg Isn't that a picture of the spokesperson for the Democratic Party?

Newtan08
June 13th, 2006, 9:01 am
you guys are fast

cyph3r7
June 13th, 2006, 9:06 am
you guys are fast

some of us get up at o'dark thirty and sadly have a routine that involves coffee and the news. :)

ScottFree
June 13th, 2006, 9:10 am
NOT!!!!:dance: :clap: :dance: :clap:

mrclark
June 13th, 2006, 9:11 am
Ze KosKids vill be zoooooo zaaaaad!

GregMartin
June 13th, 2006, 9:29 am
This should shut Flakey the hell up.Dreamer...

Yankee in NC
June 13th, 2006, 9:43 am
Libs were looking for an Elephant for Fitzmas, but they will have to settle for some Crow.

GregMartin
June 13th, 2006, 9:46 am
http://llamabutchers.mu.nu/archives/karl_rove.jpg
BiggestAl is really only this big

Dreamy
June 13th, 2006, 9:47 am
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Dreamy2/patriotic-political-military/rovehaha.jpg

chip
June 13th, 2006, 9:48 am
Merry Fitzmas Biggs.

Jíbaro
June 13th, 2006, 9:48 am
Big-Old-Al has been proven wrong again.
I guess he will do what Cometlook did when Dan Rather was proven a liar.

Liability
June 13th, 2006, 11:17 am
Ladies and Gentlemen! Some public service announcements!

(1) BigOldAl was -- what's that word again? --

WRONG!


(2) Due to circumstances beyond our control, this year

FITZMAS has been CANCELLED!


Ho ho ho!

tha malcontent™
June 13th, 2006, 11:18 am
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.

There is some Fresh Crow here for one Biggestal...

Fresh Crow... Come and get it!

:)

peace...

Liability
June 13th, 2006, 11:22 am
BigOld "Homer" Al:

"Crow -- yum!"

"Do'oh!"

gdoane
June 13th, 2006, 11:23 am
ROFL!!! Teflon, bay-bee! Teflon!! Rove can do ANYTHING!!! He is absolutely a JEWEL in the fight against liberalism at all costs!! With a Superman like Rove able to dodge any bullet, the liberals have no hope as we pillage and plunder and sack and loot the poor, the homeless and the disadvantaged right under their stupid noses!

Ooops... did I say that out loud??

Iggy
June 13th, 2006, 11:27 am
I love it when a gay thread goes straight. :))

Dreamy
June 13th, 2006, 11:37 am
Summing up the collective liberal response to Rove being cleared..

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Dreamy2/patriotic-political-military/crybaby.gif

mrclark
June 13th, 2006, 11:45 am
bump

Crossriflesonblue
June 13th, 2006, 11:47 am
Someone needs to splain "not" indicted to bigge.

Liability
June 13th, 2006, 11:50 am
Someone needs to splain "not" indicted to bigge.

That would be a difficult teaching assignment since it goes contrary to BigOldAl's natural "fair-minded" liberal inclinations -- that when one is of the opposing political philosophy, one is presumed guilty.

HOW on Earth could somebody HE presumes guilty NOT get indicted?

It boggles his "liberal" mind.

GertBFroeb
June 13th, 2006, 11:50 am
I guess biggest airhole is a LIAR

Joeybear23
June 13th, 2006, 11:58 am
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.

:think:

NightTrain
June 13th, 2006, 11:58 am
No frog marching for Fitzmas...

bella-day
June 13th, 2006, 11:59 am
:think:


Wonder where biggie is when you need him....huh?

mmancil
June 13th, 2006, 12:00 pm
I love it when a gay thread goes straight. :))


Best line all day!!

:)) :)) :))

Joeybear23
June 13th, 2006, 12:01 pm
No frog marching for Fitzmas...

Fitzmas has been cancelled.

Vindicator
June 13th, 2006, 12:03 pm
Well, I guess we can put tis "Rove Indicted" Thread to bed now!!

ETC(SW/AW)
USN Ret.

tha malcontent™
June 13th, 2006, 12:16 pm
There is some Fresh Crow here for one Biggestal...

Fresh Crow... Come and get it!

:)

peace...

Ello?... Biggie?...

:)

peace...

DanBlather
June 13th, 2006, 12:28 pm
Wonder where biggie is when you need him....huh?Where is Biggie when you need him ????...

Karl Christian Rove
June 13th, 2006, 12:48 pm
I think these unfortunate reports of my untimely demise were greatly exaggerated.

Ronin11208
June 13th, 2006, 1:33 pm
So much for (un)Truthout.org :))

GregMartin
June 13th, 2006, 1:37 pm
http://llamabutchers.mu.nu/archives/karl_rove.jpg
BiggestAl is really only this big

Dreamy
June 13th, 2006, 1:55 pm
So much for (un)Truthout.org :))

:clap:



June 13, 2006

Rove Cleared, Zarqawi Dead, GOP Doomed (http://www.scrappleface.com/?p=2279)

by Scott Ott (scottott@scrappleface.com)


(2006-06-13) — Republican electoral prospects in November appeared bleaker than ever this week after U.S. forces allowed al Qaeda leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi to die in their custody and President George Bush’s close friend and adviser Karl Rove fanned the flames of conspiracy theories by preventing a special prosecutor from charging him with any wrongdoing in the CIA leak investigation.

White House sources failed to return phone calls last night, in a virtual communication lockdown, as the Bush administration hunkered down to figure out how to cope with the latest breaking news.

In five appearances before a grand jury Mr. Rove employed what one source called “his Jedi mind tricks.”

“But it was all for nothing,” the unnamed source said, “Since the lack of charges against him will only confirm America’s worst fears — that Karl Rove controls everything.”

Meanwhile jubilant Democrats hunted for media microphones, as one lawmaker said, “to kick the cowboy while he’s down.”

This week’s slight increase in the president’s popularity ratings only highlights the depths to which he has fallen, according to political experts.
In a bit of fortuitous timing, a Democrat National Committee spokesman said the DNC is on the verge of announcing its vision and plan for America’s future, which should be unveiled “any day now in the coming months.”

California Rep. Nancy Pelosi, the presumptive Speaker of the House, took the high road, offering “words of consolation and comfort to our beleaguered Command in Chief.”
“We must rally around our chief executive in his time of need,” Rep. Pelosi said. “I call on all Americans to pray that God would lift President Bush from this pit of despair, and restore his confidence so that he may lead us boldly.”

http://www.scrappleface.com/?p=2279

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Dreamy2/patriotic-political-military/lolol.gif

Gengar
June 13th, 2006, 2:00 pm
Hey big... where you at? Still frothing over this?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/061206Z.shtml

:)) :)) :)) :))

tha malcontent™
June 13th, 2006, 2:03 pm
Jay Marvin on the Local Err Amerika Affiliate in Colorado, Erring out of The People's (r)epublic of Boulder, spent his Mourning, yes, Mourning, Fielding calls from Conservatives wondering if his "Sources" would be on to Explain why, in Fact, Rove will not be Indicted for Outing a Covert Agent...

I can't get enough of it.

No Person will ever be Indicted or Convicted of Outing Miss Plame, because she was NOT Covert when pushing for her Husband to go and Politicize Yellow Cake and do Harm to this War we are Engaged in Against Jihadistan.

Facts are Facts.

Another Massive Loss for the Left.

HA-HA!... Talk about yer Pieces of Crap!

:)

peace...

Gengar
June 13th, 2006, 2:08 pm
I guess shouting "KKKarl Rove!!!!!!!!!" a million times doesn’t really make him guilty of anything does it?

Mike88
June 13th, 2006, 2:09 pm
This thread goes right up there with such liberal legends as:

Cometlook & thebias, and the multiple times they made fools of themselves in just this same manner. (Dave818 - help me out if you have the links to those threads).

InsHannity and his "Repub Nephew in Iraq Voting Dem over Gay Issue", in which his supposed email was nothing more than a lib internet template that was easily tracked down with google.

GregMartin
June 13th, 2006, 2:11 pm
Now lets investigate conspiracy to defraud the US government with taxpayers money on plame and wilson.

Dreamy
June 13th, 2006, 2:17 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Dreamy2/patriotic-political-military/250966.jpg

:)) :)) :))

5thIDSoldier
June 13th, 2006, 2:33 pm
Rove is laughing all the way to the White House.

The dems are stuck in the outhouse. Between this and the death of Al Zaqari in Iraq, the Dems are left playing with themselves wondering how to get elected come November.

GregMartin
June 13th, 2006, 2:37 pm
don't forget about their brilliant almost win in Cali's 50th

Mike88
June 13th, 2006, 2:40 pm
don't forget about their brilliant almost win in Cali's 50th

That was a victory according to the left. I wish them many more such "victories"! :))

Gengar
June 13th, 2006, 2:41 pm
"coverup!" :))

Dreamy
June 13th, 2006, 3:19 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Dreamy2/patriotic-political-military/eatcrow.jpg

tha malcontent™
June 13th, 2006, 3:21 pm
Biggie has been Active on the 13th here...

Wonder why he Avoids this Specific Thread of his on this Day?...

Plenty of Crow for ya, Biggie!

:)

peace...

Seedy
June 13th, 2006, 3:23 pm
Gee, I guess we can officially call off the "indict Rove" watch, huh?
Can we now start an "indict Bush" thread?

NightTrain
June 13th, 2006, 3:26 pm
Gee, I guess we can officially call off the "indict Rove" watch, huh?
Can we now start an "indict Bush" thread?
Some libbies think the "indict Cheney" verdict is coming soon...

They're a bit reluctant to start a thread, though...;)

DiveCon
June 13th, 2006, 3:28 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v465/Dreamy2/patriotic-political-military/eatcrow.jpg

:))

upsetmom
June 13th, 2006, 3:30 pm
Rove is laughing all the way to the White House.

The dems are stuck in the outhouse. Between this and the death of Al Zaqari in Iraq, the Dems are left playing with themselves wondering how to get elected come November.

Well, the last couple of losses were called "wins" by libbies, so zarqawi's hour before death is probably looked on as a "victory" as well. He "almost lived" for that hour, so that was really a defeat for our military.

I think kerry (together with gore, who, after all, invented the internet) is secretly in charge of the information dissemination for the dem party. They keep "nearly" and "almost" and "partially" releasing, inventing, and creating things.

:))

May they stay on this same fabulous path.

dave818
June 13th, 2006, 4:58 pm
bump

dave818
June 13th, 2006, 5:05 pm
Best thread ever?

withoutfeathers
June 13th, 2006, 5:17 pm
Gee, I guess we can officially call off the "indict Rove" watch, huh?
Can we now start an "indict Bush" thread?Patience, patience, Seedy. We have to work our way up the chain of command. Dick Cheney is next in line for indictment watch -- only then can we start waiting for the mother of all indictments. :)

Y2Bogus
June 13th, 2006, 5:17 pm
If the libs were to wipe all the egg off their face, it could end world hunger.

GregMartin
June 13th, 2006, 5:33 pm
Best thread ever?It sure ranks up there

Liability
June 13th, 2006, 5:52 pm
Question: How does BigOldAl like his CROW?

Answer: For breakfast, lunch, dinner, dessert and snack.

:mrgreen:

Crow:

For EVERY MEAL!

cfinstr
June 13th, 2006, 6:04 pm
What a pathetic thread this has become in light of REALITY!!!

Typical socialist/Democrap whining...

:D

NightTrain
June 13th, 2006, 6:09 pm
A thread that wil live in infamy....

Darkwind
June 13th, 2006, 6:11 pm
Oops..

tha malcontent™
June 13th, 2006, 6:15 pm
Methinks Biggie is in the Can Yakkin' Crow!...

Clear out some room, B... There's more to come!

:)

peace...

Liability
June 13th, 2006, 6:23 pm
On BigOldAl's menu tonight:

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/DarthLiability/JungleCrowBM.jpg

And every night

And every afternoon

and every morning

:mrgreen:

Crow: It's what's for dinner!

Dreamy
June 13th, 2006, 6:41 pm
On BigOldAl's menu tonight:

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/DarthLiability/JungleCrowBM.jpg

And every night

And every afternoon

and every morning

:mrgreen:

Crow: It's what's for dinner!

The libs can put that crow pate on that toast they had saved for Rove. Bwaaaaaaaaaahhhhh!:))

tha malcontent™
June 13th, 2006, 7:00 pm
On BigOldAl's menu tonight:

http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/DarthLiability/JungleCrowBM.jpg

And every night

And every afternoon

and every morning

:mrgreen:

Crow: It's what's for dinner!

He should ask PeterGriffin and 7426Karl for some Recipies for Crow! ;)

Never has more Crow been Eatin' in the History of Hannity.com.

:)

peace...

Liability
June 13th, 2006, 7:01 pm
He should ask PeterGriffin and 7426Karl for some Recipies for Crow! ;)

Never has more Crow been Eatin' in the History of Hannity.com.

:)

peace...

These libbies are eating so much damn crow, PETA is up in arms!

tha malcontent™
June 13th, 2006, 7:47 pm
These libbies are eating so much damn crow, PETA is up in arms!

I Always Appreciate a PETA Reference!

More Crow, Biggie?

:)

peace...

Liability
June 13th, 2006, 7:57 pm
Ironic, isn't it, that BigOldAl has NOTHING to

CROW about!


And that abject confession of his amazingly ignorant arrogant error?

It must be stuck in his craw.

tha malcontent™
June 13th, 2006, 8:02 pm
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.

http://forums.site5.com/images/smilies/roflmao.gif

:)

peace...

Liability
June 13th, 2006, 8:09 pm
BigOldAl is more than sufficiently pwn3d:

http://s53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/DarthLiability/th_owned.jpg <--- maybe we've been too tough on BigOwnedAl.

ScottFree
June 13th, 2006, 8:58 pm
I think this thread deserves permanent sticky status.

GregMartin
June 14th, 2006, 12:29 am
Is it true? I heard Rove was indicted.

BAAA HAAA HAAA HAAA
:))

Bushmaster1969
June 14th, 2006, 12:30 am
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/014833.html

commentary: where is Darkblade when you need him?

ahahahahahahahahaahahahahahaahahahahahaahhaahah

The "I forgot" defense don't work when lying to the feds.


Does crow taste better fried or baked?

Ronin11208
June 14th, 2006, 12:31 am
I think this thread deserves permanent sticky status.:))

GregMartin
June 14th, 2006, 12:44 am
Man, libtards, you might not have gotten Rove, but at least
IN GOD WE TRUST

JohnGaltLine
June 14th, 2006, 12:47 am
hehehehehehe.

Man, the liberals must feel like a 17 year old boy who just got a knee to the groin from his date as he was rounding 3rd base in the back of a limo on prom night. DOH!

Sneaky SF Dude
June 14th, 2006, 12:50 am
Man, libtards, you might not have gotten Rove, but at least
IN GOD WE TRUST
LOL

Thomas603
June 14th, 2006, 12:58 am
BigOldAl is more than sufficiently pwn3d:

http://s53.photobucket.com/albums/g56/DarthLiability/th_owned.jpg <--- maybe we've been too tough on BigOwnedAl.

And then some. He retains his status as LIBERAL, and PWN3D!

GregMartin
June 14th, 2006, 9:42 am
This here particular thread jist a ainta gonna be gittin no old no time soon.
-- Deputy Marshall Festus

dave818
June 14th, 2006, 11:16 am
daily bump

Liability
June 14th, 2006, 11:51 am
daily bump

Timely and

satisfying.

See ya tomorrow?

tha malcontent™
June 14th, 2006, 12:58 pm
At least PeterGriffin Conceded himself as my Property on the K5 Thread...

Where's Biggie?

:)

peace...

cyph3r7
June 14th, 2006, 3:50 pm
ya know most people with class would have ended this a while ago by simply apologizing and stating they were wrong.

Funny how threads like this become void of libs

whoops did I just bump this?

GregMartin
June 14th, 2006, 4:02 pm
2nd page aint good enough.

Blackrain
June 14th, 2006, 4:53 pm
:arrow: So much for (un)Truthout.org :))
Deserves repeating
:)) :clap: :)) :)) :))

gb2004
June 14th, 2006, 4:58 pm
:dance: :dance: :dance: :dance:

Gray
June 14th, 2006, 6:43 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v328/Mike1962/21214194_0535787ec1.jpg

lsue
June 14th, 2006, 6:49 pm
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v328/Mike1962/21214194_0535787ec1.jpg


bumpitty bump bump

and ta daaaaaaaaaaaa!!!

( I confess I just may be having waaaaay too much fun with this)
:mrgreen:

Mortis
June 14th, 2006, 7:13 pm
It is rather humorous

GregMartin
June 14th, 2006, 10:59 pm
Best thread of 2006

Mike88
June 15th, 2006, 12:58 am
Best thread of 2006

I think it will join Liability's Form 180 thread as an all time classic that never really goes away. :)

Liability
June 15th, 2006, 5:03 am
I think it will join Liability's Form 180 thread as an all time classic that never really goes away. :)

I love some of the classics!


A CLASSIC! :lol: (http://www.hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1443) <--- Link to a classic! :lol: :lol:

Rdkz04
June 15th, 2006, 5:26 am
Bigg is the legend that he is because of this thread

GregMartin
June 15th, 2006, 9:47 am
Bigg is the legend that he is because of this threadBig corn is the legend that he is because of many threads like this one.

Dreamy
June 15th, 2006, 10:11 am
Great thread!

And unTruthout states they are "standing down" on the Rove matter? What the hell is that? Lefty speak is so foreign to me. Translation anyone?

Is that a lefty retraction?:wall:

Liability
June 15th, 2006, 11:07 am
Great thread!

And unTruthout states they are "standing down" on the Rove matter? What the hell is that? Lefty speak is so foreign to me. Translation anyone?

Is that a lefty retraction?:wall:

I believe the rough translation is: "We were clearly not just wrong but WAY the hell wrong and we just don't have the 'nads to actually come right out and say it or admit it and certainly not enough integrity to apologize to the falsely accused Mr. Rove -- so let's just officially declare that we aren't going to repeat our idiotic non-story now that it is absolutely refuted. Maybe if we ignore this whole topic and our own embarrassment, it will just 'go away' so we can stop being so embarrassed without ever having to own up to it."

But ya gotta give 'em some credit. Their lib-speak is a lot more concise.

Dreamy
June 15th, 2006, 11:22 am
I believe the rough translation is: "We were clearly not just wrong but WAY the hell wrong and we just don't have the 'nads to actually come right out and say it or admit it and certainly not enough integrity to apologize to the falsely accused Mr. Rove -- so let's just officially declare that we aren't going to repeat our idiotic non-story now that it is absolutely refuted. Maybe if we ignore this whole topic and our own embarrassment, it will just 'go away' so we can stop being so embarrassed without ever having to own up to it."

But ya gotta give 'em some credit. Their lib-speak is a lot more concise.

Thank you for the liberal linguistics lesson. My liberal translator is malfunctioning these days.:))

Liability
June 15th, 2006, 12:24 pm
Thank you for the liberal linguistics lesson. My liberal translator is malfunctioning these days.:))

When my Universal Translator cannot manage a "Lib-speak" to "English" translation without having a melt-down, I use the old trick of programming it to translate the "lib-speak" AS THOUGH IT WERE SPOKEN OR WRITTEN IN THE ORIGINAL "BABBLE," instead.

This nifty little trick results in perfectly accurate translations, every time.

Less overheating of the hard drive, too!

:lol:

tha malcontent™
June 15th, 2006, 2:03 pm
Memo to Biggie:

http://associalisticpress.com/stewie.gif

and you are:

http://associalisticpress.com/pwned-vader.jpg

:)

peace...

Rdkz04
June 16th, 2006, 12:57 am
Bump for the Bigg man

NightTrain
June 16th, 2006, 2:22 am
No Rove indictment today...

Not no way - not no how...

Flakey Foont
June 16th, 2006, 2:29 am
When my Universal Translator cannot manage a "Lib-speak" to "English" translation without having a melt-down, I use the old trick of programming it to translate the "lib-speak" AS THOUGH IT WERE SPOKEN OR WRITTEN IN THE ORIGINAL "BABBLE," instead.

This nifty little trick results in perfectly accurate translations, every time.

Less overheating of the hard drive, too!

:lol:


It sound as if you have perfected wasting time

Mike88
June 16th, 2006, 2:34 am
It sound as if you have perfected wasting time

And it sounds as if you haven't perfected humor...

NightTrain
June 16th, 2006, 2:34 am
It sound as if you have perfected wasting time
Your sig picture is too big... (but at least it isn't hitler)

Please fix it...

Liability
June 16th, 2006, 4:35 pm
Speaking of wasting time --

Hi Fakey.

Oh and where is BigOldAl?

It's Friday.

So, I'm guessing it's time for another round of

Rove really DID get indicted after all!

Come on, Big. Give 'til it hurts!

homiebrah
June 16th, 2006, 4:57 pm
It sound as if you have perfected wasting time

Pot calling the kettle black.

dave818
June 16th, 2006, 10:19 pm
daily bump

Liability
June 17th, 2006, 12:02 pm
Pssst. Rove WAS indicted. Pass it on




to BigOldAl.

Blue Collar
June 17th, 2006, 12:06 pm
daily bumpand grind.

Liability
June 17th, 2006, 12:14 pm
and grind.

:D

And it IS a grind to get many of the uber lefties who accuse without basis and malign consistently for purely partisan political (illegitimate) reasons to apologize -- or even own-up to the nasty crap they spew.

Hey!

Any truth to the rumor that Rove has been, is now or is about to be indicted?

:mrgreen:

Blue Collar
June 17th, 2006, 12:30 pm
:D

And it IS a grind to get many of the uber lefties who accuse without basis and malign consistently for purely partisan political (illegitimate) reasons to apologize -- or even own-up to the nasty crap they spew.

Hey!

Any truth to the rumor that Rove has been, is now or is about to be indicted?

:mrgreen:Hey, I just thought the bump ... and grind ... was funny. It was an inspiration that hit me (excuse the pun) out of left field.

As to Rove, he's pure Machiavelli regardless of what Fitz does. No doubt Karl is a bright guy, a political engineer of the first order. That said, his famous speech about what liberals did following 9/11 was nothing short of intellectually dishonest divider rhetoric. I met very few libs and regressives in combat, just Americans pulling together. Karl Rove can kiss my red, white and blue ass.

He wins elections for you, and that's great, but don't offer him as some sort of saint to be pitied, or I'll lose my breakfast.

Flakey Foont
June 17th, 2006, 12:34 pm
Speaking of wasting time --

Hi Fakey.

Oh and where is BigOldAl?

It's Friday.

So, I'm guessing it's time for another round of

Rove really DID get indicted after all!

Come on, Big. Give 'til it hurts!


The amazing thing is that you would defend a political hack like rove in the first place

CrusaderFrank
June 17th, 2006, 12:37 pm
Pssst...don't drink the milk.

Liability
June 17th, 2006, 1:30 pm
Hey, I just thought the bump ... and grind ... was funny. It was an inspiration that hit me (excuse the pun) out of left field.

As to Rove, he's pure Machiavelli regardless of what Fitz does. No doubt Karl is a bright guy, a political engineer of the first order. That said, his famous speech about what liberals did following 9/11 was nothing short of intellectually dishonest divider rhetoric. I met very few libs and regressives in combat, just Americans pulling together. Karl Rove can kiss my red, white and blue ass.

He wins elections for you, and that's great, but don't offer him as some sort of saint to be pitied, or I'll lose my breakfast.

The bump and grind line WAS funny.

Karl Rove is not a saint.

He's just not the sinner that the lefties generally portray.

They generally hate him ONLY because he's so effective. And his worst "offenses" pale compared to the crap done by his NUMEROUS counterparts on the left.

Liability
June 17th, 2006, 1:31 pm
The amazing thing is that you would defend a political hack like rove in the first place

No. Wrong yet again, Fakey.

The amazing and very sad part is that for no valid reason Rove needs to even be defended.

That's all you and your ilk.

Blue Collar
June 17th, 2006, 1:33 pm
The bump and grind line WAS funny.

Karl Rove is not a saint.

He's just not the sinner that the lefties generally portray.

They generally hate him ONLY because he's so effective. And his worst "offenses" pale compared to the crap done by his NUMEROUS counterparts on the left.Okay, I can buy this sufficiently for us to remain friends.

tha malcontent™
June 17th, 2006, 4:18 pm
http://associalisticpress.com/pwned-vader.jpg

:)

peace...

gb2004
June 17th, 2006, 4:37 pm
Rove was indicted? Again? :eek:

Oh, wait............never mind.:)) :))

Liability
June 17th, 2006, 8:42 pm
Okay, I can buy this sufficiently for us to remain friends.

I hate the fact that you actually have turned out to be more cool than I'd ever suspected.

:D

Flakey Foont
June 17th, 2006, 8:50 pm
No. Wrong yet again, Fakey.

The amazing and very sad part is that for no valid reason Rove needs to even be defended.

That's all you and your ilk.


Rove needs a defense alright; he has more enemies than Saddam

Mike88
June 17th, 2006, 8:52 pm
Rove needs a defense alright; he has more enemies than Saddam

Give me a break. We already lnow that any given conservative is hated by the vast majority of the left.

Liability
June 17th, 2006, 8:54 pm
Rove needs a defense alright; he has more enemies than Saddam

A defense against being "hated?" :rolleyes:

No. That's not what was being discussed.

If you must obfuscate, why not go elsewhere?

If you want to stick to the topic though, feel free to try again.

Flakey Foont
June 17th, 2006, 9:07 pm
A defense against being "hated?" :rolleyes:

No. That's not what was being discussed.

If you must obfuscate, why not go elsewhere?

If you want to stick to the topic though, feel free to try again.


the fact of the matter is Rove will get his cumupens sooner or later, it's just a question of opportunity, just like Delay, Coulter and Rush

Liability
June 17th, 2006, 9:11 pm
the fact of the matter is Rove will get his cumupens sooner or later, it's just a question of opportunity, just like Delay, Coulter and Rush


So, you pretty much have nothing to say, then.

You could have just said so.

Or said nothing at all.

Saved some electrons.