Robert Edward Kroff
September 20th, 2009, 3:06 pm
Why does the White House have on their contact form, found here> http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ under the first selection of "I have a policy comment" in the "*subject" box (1 of 3 choices) list the selection in a more specific "*subject" box that opens up automatically directly below it after selecting "I have a policy comment" list "environment/economy" and not "energy/economy as a given selection?
Before I go one here I must say to all the people reading this, you do not need to begin to compose an answer in your head in making a reply post back to me because I do know the answer to my own question. The reason why I posted this topic here is because I think it should be an issue that people should know about. It's wrong period to have such an incorrect listing regardless of the eco political point the White House is obviously trying to make with such a listing reflecting it's warped policy pursuits. This is the White House has a convoluted policy trying to tie environment and energy together into a single concept. It is of course an extension of GE's eco-imagination gone wild. A corporate program that has invaded U.S. domestic policy even some of our foreign policy as well in attempting to force the concept of "Cap & Trade" onto the rest of the industrialized world with GE waiting behind the scenes to step-in with its eco-madness concepts, and profit-profit.
Getting back to my humble topic, I think people should know about this as an issue because feature this, tens of thousands of kids every week logging onto the White House website where each one of them want to write the President a "save the Earth" letter, and so choose to make a policy comment regarding the environment. So they all select "I have a policy comment" from the list in the "*subject" box given. Then the additional "*subject" box list that opens up automatically directly below this first "*subject" box lists "environment/economy" together. They now have to choose from this additional "*subject" box list a forced selection of "environment/economy" that forces an imprint onto their impressionable developing brains the very flawed concept that the subject of "environment" is closely coupled with the subject of the "economy" more so than any other subject on the list given which includes the subject of "energy" on it; the very subject that "economy" is directly tied to more so than any other subject imaginable.
This may all sound trivial to some, but picture this for example. A child around 10 years of age, a 5th grader, wants to write President Obama a letter on why it's so important to save the polar bears, (You know, like the one that's been riding that melting iceberg in those eco-flicks they've been showing in schools over the past 40 years.) but the child is confronted with making a selection in the "*subject" box that appears on the White House's letter writing form an incorrect concept, and must choose it in order to complete this task. The child is forced to title the subject of his or her letter regarding the environment "environment/energy" where the subject of "environment" and "economy" are incorrectly listed together for purely political reasons, before the child is even able to write one character of, "Dear, Mr. President." This makes a big stamp of incorrect information on the child's brain. This is because the child reading all the possible selections in the second "*subject" box has to make the selection of "environment/economy" in order to make the correct selection. That's called "brainwashing." It's brainwashing because the child will notice, and remember that "energy" as a selection is on the list all alone being completely disconnected from the subject of "economy" which it should be coupled with instead of incorrectly with the subject of "environment."
Now feature this for an encore in this scenario. A few years later all these kids taught this incorrect information off the White House website take their first economics class, and can't figure out how or why the subject of energy is thee major factor contained within in the subject of economics, or why the subject of energy never comes up in biology class. Kids all a cross America are bewildered and confused because a few years before they learned incorrectly from President Obama's White House website that the subject of the environment is closely related to the subject of energy, and has nothing to do with the subject of economics.
These are my thoughts for what they're worth.
Before I go one here I must say to all the people reading this, you do not need to begin to compose an answer in your head in making a reply post back to me because I do know the answer to my own question. The reason why I posted this topic here is because I think it should be an issue that people should know about. It's wrong period to have such an incorrect listing regardless of the eco political point the White House is obviously trying to make with such a listing reflecting it's warped policy pursuits. This is the White House has a convoluted policy trying to tie environment and energy together into a single concept. It is of course an extension of GE's eco-imagination gone wild. A corporate program that has invaded U.S. domestic policy even some of our foreign policy as well in attempting to force the concept of "Cap & Trade" onto the rest of the industrialized world with GE waiting behind the scenes to step-in with its eco-madness concepts, and profit-profit.
Getting back to my humble topic, I think people should know about this as an issue because feature this, tens of thousands of kids every week logging onto the White House website where each one of them want to write the President a "save the Earth" letter, and so choose to make a policy comment regarding the environment. So they all select "I have a policy comment" from the list in the "*subject" box given. Then the additional "*subject" box list that opens up automatically directly below this first "*subject" box lists "environment/economy" together. They now have to choose from this additional "*subject" box list a forced selection of "environment/economy" that forces an imprint onto their impressionable developing brains the very flawed concept that the subject of "environment" is closely coupled with the subject of the "economy" more so than any other subject on the list given which includes the subject of "energy" on it; the very subject that "economy" is directly tied to more so than any other subject imaginable.
This may all sound trivial to some, but picture this for example. A child around 10 years of age, a 5th grader, wants to write President Obama a letter on why it's so important to save the polar bears, (You know, like the one that's been riding that melting iceberg in those eco-flicks they've been showing in schools over the past 40 years.) but the child is confronted with making a selection in the "*subject" box that appears on the White House's letter writing form an incorrect concept, and must choose it in order to complete this task. The child is forced to title the subject of his or her letter regarding the environment "environment/energy" where the subject of "environment" and "economy" are incorrectly listed together for purely political reasons, before the child is even able to write one character of, "Dear, Mr. President." This makes a big stamp of incorrect information on the child's brain. This is because the child reading all the possible selections in the second "*subject" box has to make the selection of "environment/economy" in order to make the correct selection. That's called "brainwashing." It's brainwashing because the child will notice, and remember that "energy" as a selection is on the list all alone being completely disconnected from the subject of "economy" which it should be coupled with instead of incorrectly with the subject of "environment."
Now feature this for an encore in this scenario. A few years later all these kids taught this incorrect information off the White House website take their first economics class, and can't figure out how or why the subject of energy is thee major factor contained within in the subject of economics, or why the subject of energy never comes up in biology class. Kids all a cross America are bewildered and confused because a few years before they learned incorrectly from President Obama's White House website that the subject of the environment is closely related to the subject of energy, and has nothing to do with the subject of economics.
These are my thoughts for what they're worth.