PDA

View Full Version : CBS dutifully defends Obama for being specific on HCR


ksdb
September 2nd, 2009, 5:52 pm
This is the biggest suck-up job I think I've seen ... ever.

Obama Up Against Ideology More than Specificity

"The president is considering all of his options on how to advance the debate and get reform passed," said a White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

- - -

And yesterday's CBS News poll provided the White House with stark new evidence that despite it's best efforts, 60 percent of those surveyed say President Obama has failed to clearly explain his plans for health care reform. Asked if they understand his ideas, 67 percent said "no, they're confusing."

- - -

But an examination of his most recent speech on health care on August 20th, shows that he's been very specific about the provisions he wants in a health care bill.

Health Care Exchange: "We're going to have a marketplace where people can select the options that work best for them, the insurance plan that works best for them."

Government-run Health Insurance Option: "if we have a public option in there, that can help keep insurers honest; it can provide a benchmark for what an affordable basic plan should look like."

Pre-Existing Condition: "...insurance companies can't prevent you from getting health insurance because of a preexisting condition."

- - -

Mr. Obama has been specific, though he left it to Congress to draft the legislative language implementing his objectives, and that's proved to be his problem.

And based on growing public opposition to his plan, the problem he's up against is more ideology than specificity.


Ummm, Mark, specifying what you WANT is not the same as specifying how you make it happen, how you pay for it and what it will cost the taxpayers of today and tomorrow and the next generation, etc.

E7ALR
September 2nd, 2009, 5:56 pm
This is the biggest suck-up job I think I've seen ... ever.



Ummm, Mark, specifying what you WANT is not the same as specifying how you make it happen, how you pay for it and what it will cost the taxpayers of today and tomorrow and the next generation, etc.
"How will you do it?" Such a pesky question. Yet, I learned that 'how" is one of the basic interrogatives when I was just in grade school. One would think that college educated journalists would understand the use of a "basic" interrogative.

aep1974
September 2nd, 2009, 6:04 pm
Mr. Obama has been specific, though he left it to Congress to draft the legislative language implementing his objectives, and that's proved to be his problem.

Wow. So, according to CBS, the person in the Executive shouldn't let those in the Legislative draft.....legislation? Huh. I guess CBS wouldn't mind a dictatorship at all, then, would they? :rolleyes:

Hey, clue boy......separation of powers. Checks and balances. Too difficult to understand?

Oh, and since it's CBS and not a fellow poster...I can say this. "...that's proved to be his problem"? Let's spell that out to see if it's grammatically correct, shall we? That has proved......oops, wrong! Great journalism there! :rolleyes:

JerryN
September 2nd, 2009, 6:08 pm
This is the biggest suck-up job I think I've seen ... ever.



Ummm, Mark, specifying what you WANT is not the same as specifying how you make it happen, how you pay for it and what it will cost the taxpayers of today and tomorrow and the next generation, etc.

I wasn't aware that this country was established to give the rulers what THEY want.

Isn't the head of the Executive Branch supposed to carry out the wishes of the People as expressed by their Representatives?

What do the PEOPLE want?
Its pretty obvious they don't wnat what Congress has put together so far.

What is Congress doing to change their misguided legislation?

Obama should be concerned over how in the hell his administration could carry out any revisions.
You never hear anything about How they are going to get any of this done.

JudasGoat
September 2nd, 2009, 6:25 pm
what bias?!?!?

Steel-W0LF
September 2nd, 2009, 6:30 pm
Isn't the head of the Executive Branch supposed to carry out the wishes of the People as expressed by their Representatives?

Off topic, but actually no he's not supposed to do what the people want.

Executive Branch: Formed to represent the interests of the Nation on the whole. Do what best for the country. (he's failing)

Legislative Branch:
Congress: Formed to represent the will of the people. (not today)
Senate: Originally the Senate was chosen by congress from a list of canidates supplied by state legislators. This was to cause the senate to represent the states interests.

Moving the senate from being chosen by the state, and ratified by congress, to being elected by the public, has shifted power out of the states hands. As now senators have to play politics with the public rather that do whats best for the states.

States rights have suffored from it.

simssk
September 2nd, 2009, 6:34 pm
Did you hear Katie Couric's speech?

I heard it on the radio this morning. She had no business saying that crap in a national newscast. It was opinion, her opinion all the way - what at one time used to be considered an editorial.

This media is so in the bag for obama. It deserves to be called a state run media. It is beyond disgusting.