View Full Version : I am so proud of America!!!
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 1:58 am
America is begining to stand together for the 1st time in a long time.
Now that Obama has exposed himself as the Communist he is, America is begining to reject him.
America is rejecting Communism!!!
Just check out the recent polls:
Presidential Tracking Poll
30% Strongly Approve
39% Strongly Disapprove
25% of U.S. voters now say the stimulus plan has helped the economy
31% say the stimulus actually hurt the economy
31% of voters say Obama is moving the country is moving in the right direction
63% of voters say Obama is moving the country is moving in the wrong direction
44% of U.S. voters are in favor of Commiecare, while 53% are opposed.
61% of voters say cost is the biggest health care is the problem facing the nation today, not the lack of universal health insurance.
Voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on eight out of 10 key electoral issues, including, for the second straight month, the top issue of the economy. (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues)
All Rasmussen polls July 25, 2009
dave rogers
July 26th, 2009, 2:05 am
We the people aint out of this mess yet. However it does seem America is finally starting to wake the sleeping giant.
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 2:06 am
Is that it I thought it would be more?:eh:
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 2:25 am
America is begining to stand together for the 1st time in a long time.
Now that Obama has exposed himself as the Communist he is, America is begining to reject him.
America is rejecting Communism!!!
Just check out the recent polls:
Presidential Tracking Poll
30% Strongly Approve
39% Strongly Disapprove
25% of U.S. voters now say the stimulus plan has helped the economy
31% say the stimulus actually hurt the economy
31% of voters say Obama is moving the country is moving in the right direction
63% of voters say Obama is moving the country is moving in the wrong direction
44% of U.S. voters are in favor of Commiecare, while 53% are opposed.
61% of voters say cost is the biggest health care is the problem facing the nation today, not the lack of universal health insurance.
Voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on eight out of 10 key electoral issues, including, for the second straight month, the top issue of the economy. (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues)
All Rasmussen polls July 25, 2009
Victory in 2012 eh?
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 2:46 am
Victory in 2012 eh?
Better than just that. If America continues to reject Commie Obammie's evil plans, Dems up for re-election will reject him. Obama won't get any of his Commie take over accomplished. If the Dems don't reject him and the people do, the Repubs will have Congress in 2010 for sure. Obama will be stopped cold.
Obama is failing and America is waking up!!!
America is rejecting Communism!!!
I love it!!!
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 2:51 am
Better than just that. If America continues to reject Commie Obammie's evil plans. Dems up for re-election will reject him. Obama won't get any of his Commie take over accomplished. If the Dems don't reject him and the people do, the Repubs will have Congress in 2010 for sure. Obama will be stopped cold.
Obama is failing and America is waking up!!!
America is rejecting Communism!!!
I love it!!!
"Father forgive them for they know not what they do!"
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 3:17 am
"Father forgive them for they know not what they do!"
Them being?
hailreagan
July 26th, 2009, 3:20 am
Them being?
obama voters
DougBH
July 26th, 2009, 3:21 am
You mean that people are beginning to realize that "stimulus" is just shorthand for raiding the treasury? The question is, why did it take people so long to realize this.
People were opposed to Republicans for raiding the treasury. They switched to Democrats, who did even a bigger job of raiding the treasury. The question is, where do you go from here?
hailreagan
July 26th, 2009, 3:25 am
You mean that people are beginning to realize that "stimulus" is just shorthand for raiding the treasury? The question is, why did it take people so long to realize this.
People were opposed to Republicans for raiding the treasury. They switched to Democrats, who did even a bigger job of raiding the treasury. The question is, where do you go from here?
The other way.
AZ Lumberjack
July 26th, 2009, 3:28 am
America is begining to stand together for the 1st time in a long time.
Now that Obama has exposed himself as the Communist he is, America is begining to reject him.
America is rejecting Communism!!!
Just check out the recent polls:
Presidential Tracking Poll
30% Strongly Approve
39% Strongly Disapprove
25% of U.S. voters now say the stimulus plan has helped the economy
31% say the stimulus actually hurt the economy
31% of voters say Obama is moving the country is moving in the right direction
63% of voters say Obama is moving the country is moving in the wrong direction
44% of U.S. voters are in favor of Commiecare, while 53% are opposed.
61% of voters say cost is the biggest health care is the problem facing the nation today, not the lack of universal health insurance.
Voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on eight out of 10 key electoral issues, including, for the second straight month, the top issue of the economy. (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues)
All Rasmussen polls July 25, 2009
You should find someone in the U.S. who actually lived under Communist rule in either the Soviet Union, the former Warsaw Pact countries, or a few others that I can think of. And ask them whether or not they believe Obama is a Communist leader. I know two people who had to live under Communist rule. One from Romania, the other from the former Soviet Union.
From what I gathered by talking to them, they'd probably laugh at you and tell you that you have no idea what Communist rule really is, or what the reprocussions are from living under actual Communist rule, and they may even get upset at the notion that you would make such a comparison. And they're not terribly political people as neither of them voted in the 2008 Presidential Election, as neither are registered voters, and have little desire to be registered. They know Communism when they see it, and this isn't it. Not even close.
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 3:51 am
You should find someone in the U.S. who actually lived under Communist rule in either the Soviet Union, the former Warsaw Pact countries, or a few others that I can think of. And ask them whether or not they believe Obama is a Communist leader. I know two people who had to live under Communist rule. One from Romania, the other from the former Soviet Union.
From what I gathered by talking to them, they'd probably laugh at you and tell you that you have no idea what Communist rule really is, or what the reprocussions are from living under actual Communist rule, and they may even get upset at the notion that you would make such a comparison. And they're not terribly political people as neither of them voted in the 2008 Presidential Election, as neither are registered voters, and have little desire to be registered. They know Communism when they see it, and this isn't it. Not even close.
Who said we are living under Communist rule?
I just said Obama is a Communist. Socialism is the stepping stone from Capitalism to Communism. We would have a long way to go before America is a Communist country.
Here are the facts:
Obama himself wrote in his book that he flirted with Marxism in his college days, attending “socialist conferences” and reading a lot of pro-communist literature. Also, the man who Obama described as his childhood mentor, Frank Marshall Davis, was an active member of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA).
“I chose my friends carefully; the more politically active black students, the foreign students, the Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets.” - Barack Obama
Those are his words not mine.
Obama is the 1st President in history to fire the CEO of a public traded company. We now own GM. We are taking steps towards government healthcare. We are pretty close to nationalizing banks.
Obama is attemping large steps towards Communism. America is rejecting those steps (see those polls I posted). God Bless the USA
"How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reagan
7ranz
July 26th, 2009, 3:54 am
"How do you tell a communist? Well, it’s someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It’s someone who understands Marx and Lenin." - Ronald Reagan
Alright please explain the major difference between Marx and Lenin that resulted in the Russian Revolution. I have yet to see any understanding of the matter on this board from those spouting off the charges.
DLaw911
July 26th, 2009, 3:58 am
Better than just that. If America continues to reject Commie Obammie's evil plans, Dems up for re-election will reject him. Obama won't get any of his Commie take over accomplished. If the Dems don't reject him and the people do, the Repubs will have Congress in 2010 for sure. Obama will be stopped cold.
Obama is failing and America is waking up!!!
America is rejecting Communism!!!
I love it!!!You are setting yourself up for a major bummer disappointment in 2010 and 2012.
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 4:02 am
Alright please explain the major difference between Marx and Lenin that resulted in the Russian Revolution. I have yet to see any understanding of the matter on this board from those spouting off the charges.None they were both Communists.
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 4:03 am
Alright please explain the major difference between Marx and Lenin that resulted in the Russian Revolution.
Please enlighten me
7ranz
July 26th, 2009, 4:04 am
None they were both Communists.
I certainly hope Reagan's quote doesn't hold true for you otherwise we have ourselves a commie.
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 4:06 am
Alright please explain the major difference between Marx and Lenin that resulted in the Russian Revolution. I have yet to see any understanding of the matter on this board from those spouting off the charges.The Russian Revolution was just a power grab by Lenin to be dictator so yes he is evil.
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 4:06 am
You are setting yourself up for a major bummer disappointment in 2010 and 2012.
http://i143.photobucket.com/albums/r132/steerbysteer/headinthesand.jpg
Pull your head out of .... and see the polls I posted. LMAO
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 4:06 am
I certainly hope Reagan's quote doesn't hold true for you otherwise we have ourselves a commie.Okay tell me how both of them were not communists?:rolleyes:
7ranz
July 26th, 2009, 4:10 am
Please enlighten me
The method by which the revolution would occur and how the government would look. Marx famously proclaimed 'workers of the world unite'. Lenin's revolution did not follow the idea that the overthrow by means of the proletariat. Indeed he turned the painfully populist philosophy of Marx into an elitist one. Nor did he make any effort to turn over his idea that powerful men must rule. He took a rather terrible idea (as that is the nature of populist philosophies) and turned into a far worse idea. Lenin practically created the opposite (though that is simplifying the matter a bit) of what Marx called for. Then again he sort of had to since Marxism idea had no hope of occurring.
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 4:11 am
I lost a lot of confidence in Americans when Commie Obammie won the election.
I see now they were just suckered.
I hope Americans continue to reject these Communist plans Obama has in mind.
7ranz
July 26th, 2009, 4:13 am
Okay tell me how both of them were not communists?:rolleyes:
I asked for their differences. It turns out everyone's the same if I say 'well they're both human'. Pay attention.
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 4:17 am
The method by which the revolution would occur and how the government would look. Marx famously proclaimed 'workers of the world unite'. Lenin's revolution did not follow the idea that the overthrow by means of the proletariat. Indeed he turned the painfully populist philosophy of Marx into an elitist one. Nor did he make any effort to turn over his idea that powerful men must rule. He took a rather terrible idea (as that is the nature of populist philosophies) and turned into a far worse idea. Lenin practically created the opposite (though that is simplifying the matter a bit) of what Marx called for. Then again he sort of had to since Marxism idea had no hope of occurring.Marx and Lenin were both Communists and believed in the same thing and the socialist party of Germany at the time was elitist itself.
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 4:17 am
I asked for their differences. It turns out everyone's the same if I say 'well they're both human'. Pay attention.The only difference was that Marx did not kill anyone directly like Lenin.
7ranz
July 26th, 2009, 4:17 am
Marx and Lenin were both Communists and believed in the same thing and the socialist party of Germany at the time was elitist itself.
No they didn't. Did you read my post or just respond to it?
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 4:18 am
I lost a lot of confidence in Americans when Commie Obammie won the election.
I see now they were just suckered.
:)):)) So the suckers are all going to join your side, eh?
7ranz
July 26th, 2009, 4:18 am
The only difference was that Marx did not kill anyone directly like Lenin.
If you aren't going to read what I write I'm not going to bother responding. But hopefully you will eventually find out the difference between populist anarchism and elitist totalitarianism.
Later.
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 4:20 am
If you aren't going to read what I write I'm not going to bother responding. But hopefully you will eventually find out the difference between populist anarchism and elitist totalitarianism.
Later.I mean what is your point. A communist is a communist. Yes I know Marx said, "Workers unite", and all that garbage. Here is another difference. Marx never became a dictator.
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 4:30 am
:)):)) So the suckers are all going to join your side, eh?
I have been watching the polls daily since Obama took office.
I like the trends.
Thank you America!!!
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 4:32 am
I have been watching the polls daily since Obama took office.
I like the trends.
Thank you America!!!
Yep! Polls mean everything.
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 4:32 am
Here is another difference. Marx never became a dictator.
Maybe not, but Castro was so inspired by Marx he started a Revolution.
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 4:34 am
Maybe not, but Castro was so inspired by Marx he started a Revolution.Did I not say that Marx indirectly killed millions of people by his philosophy?
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 4:36 am
Yep! Polls mean everything.
They mean a lot to the politicians
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_dick_morris/obama_s_dwindling_power
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 4:38 am
They mean a lot to the politicians
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_dick_morris/obama_s_dwindling_power
And to you as well it seems.
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 4:45 am
And to you as well it seems.
Absolutely - Polls can change the way members of Congress vote.
Example: If Obama was tracking high on Healthcare the Bue Dogs and Rinos would have already passed healthcare.
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 4:54 am
Absolutely - Polls can change the way members of Congress vote.
Maybe!
Example: If Obama was tracking high on Healthcare the Bue Dogs and Rinos would have already passed healthcare.
The bill as it stands won't pass you can be assured of that. It would be nice to get Republican input to it and work it out to everyones satisfaction. I don't think Obama really wants it to be a unilateral effort. There's going to be some compromise. Especially in the Senate. But something has to be done about this.
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 4:56 am
Maybe!
The bill as it stands won't pass you can be assured of that. It would be nice to get Republican input to it and work it out to everyones satisfaction. I don't think Obama really wants it to be a unilateral effort. There's going to be some compromise. Especially in the Senate. But something has to be done about this.Of course Obama wants just the Dems to do the healthcare remember they won so it is their Congress!:rolleyes:
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 5:03 am
Of course Obama wants just the Dems to do the healthcare remember they won so it is their Congress!:rolleyes:
That's improper thinking. That would negate any opinion by the rest of the country's citizens who are not democrat yet citizens. The Blue Dogs in affect are really forcing more of a compromise. This is a good thing, no?
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 5:08 am
That's improper thinking. That would negate any opinion by the rest of the country's citizens who are not democrat yet citizens. The Blue Dogs in affect are really forcing more of a compromise. This is a good thing, no?I like the Blue Dogs but sometimes they go with their party on spending. Democrat yet? The Party will not last to 2010!:)
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 5:13 am
I like the Blue Dogs but sometimes they go with their party on spending. Democrat yet? The Party will not last to 2010!:)
...democrat, yet citizens.
Don't the republicans go with their party on spending?
The democratic party will last. Count on it!
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 5:15 am
...democrat, yet citizens.
Don't the republicans go with their party on spending?
The democratic party will last. Count on it!I admit the Repubs do fascism. Yeah you will last because all of the immigrants coming through here into the U.S.:rolleyes:
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 5:31 am
I admit the Repubs do fascism. Yeah you will last because all of the immigrants coming through here into the U.S.:rolleyes:
I'm not a Democrat. I'm an Independent.
You mean the illegal immigrants, right?
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 5:32 am
I'm not a Democrat. I'm an Independent.
You mean the illegal immigrants, right?I meant the general you not you yourself. I mean all immigrants. legal and illegal.
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 5:34 am
I meant the general you not you yourself. I mean all immigrants. legal and illegal.
You oppose allowing LEGAL immigrants into the country?
byzantine catholic
July 26th, 2009, 5:36 am
You oppose allowing LEGAL immigrants into the country?I support a moratorium to 150,000 to 250,000 immigrants a year.
kaspiahn
July 26th, 2009, 8:14 am
I support a moratorium to 150,000 to 250,000 immigrants a year.
And I support allowing a foreign national married to a U.S. military member to be granted citizenship (free). Only if that foreign national has been married to the military member for minimum of 8 yrs during active duty service.
My personal example: My German wife who supported me during 18 yrs of my 21 yrs of service. Now she wants to become a U.S. citizen. Should she not be granted free and immediate citizenship for her service to our country?
ballen2221
July 26th, 2009, 8:25 am
And I support allowing a foreign national married to a U.S. military member to be granted citizenship (free). Only if that foreign national has been married to the military member for minimum of 8 yrs during active duty service.
My personal example: My German wife who supported me during 18 yrs of my 21 yrs of service. Now she wants to become a U.S. citizen. Should she not be granted free and immediate citizenship for her service to our country?
Yes, absolutely!:clap:
Charlie A
July 26th, 2009, 8:54 am
Alright please explain the major difference between Marx and Lenin that resulted in the Russian Revolution. I have yet to see any understanding of the matter on this board from those spouting off the charges.
Without googling, one difference is that by 1918 Marx was dead...
Marx never intended his socialist revolution to be started in Russia - he was writing for the German people. Besides which, Lenin was not a Marxist, he was a statist. The intent of Marxism is to replace the state, eventually, with the dictatorship of the proletariat. Another way of looking at that would be direct participatory democracy involving everyone, and with all property held in common, there would be no way for people to buy votes, and since there is no way to accumulate wealth, greed would no longer be a driving force in politics. In theory, the most persuasive people with the best ideas would emerge as the leaders, as opposed to people who have the most skill in manipulating others and acquiring wealth. A lovely idea that flies in the face of human nature and rejects the strongest biological imperative of most higher animals, humans included, that being the acquisition and defense of territory.
In reality the Marxist is a statist who wants to use the theories put forth by Marx as an excuse to confiscate the property of everyone else and then tell everyone what to do on behalf of "the proletariat." Since there are always counterrevolutionary elements, the state gets to establish a permanent state of emergency, and assumes the role of a police state. Dissent is crushed, rights no longer have any meaning and external enemies are targeted in order to distract the masses from their miserable circumstances. Individual initiative is seen as a threat to the social order, crime and black marketeering thrive and nationalism assumes a role that Marx did not in any way forsee. All because the Marxist is a human being, who in his heart of hearts, has a burning need to acquire and defend territory, but unlike the capitalist who uses his brains, his sweat and his instincts to do so, the Marxist uses his lies, his guns, and his useful idiots.
Mike88
July 26th, 2009, 9:00 am
You mean that people are beginning to realize that "stimulus" is just shorthand for raiding the treasury? The question is, why did it take people so long to realize this.
People were opposed to Republicans for raiding the treasury. They switched to Democrats, who did even a bigger job of raiding the treasury. The question is, where do you go from here?
You go the lesser of two evils. I know this is a sore point with a lot of people, but its logically better to have to fix the lesser of the two messes, and Republicans can be more easily dealt with by their constituents.
Yes, there is a difference between Republicans and Democrats. Republicans will get things right sometimes, and screw up sometimes. Democrats will just try to ram through a change to statist totalitarianism any chance they get. Its all they ever do.
smyrna
July 26th, 2009, 9:02 am
The Republicans and Democrats have gotten us into this mess. Do not get caught up in their bs rhetoric. We need a viable third party...now.
Mike88
July 26th, 2009, 9:02 am
The Republicans and Democrats have gotten us into this mess. Do not get caught up in their bs rhetoric. We need a viable third party...now.
Its not going to happen.
WildRose
July 26th, 2009, 9:06 am
You go the lesser of two evils. I know this is a sore point with a lot of people, but its logically better to have to fix the lesser of the two messes, and Republicans can be more easily dealt with by their constituents.
Yes, there is a difference between Republicans and Democrats. Republicans will get things right sometimes, and screw up sometimes. Democrats will just try to ram through a change to statist totalitarianism any chance they get. Its all they ever do.Well said, but I'll add to it.
If you believe in conservatism, then you vote for the most conservative candidate you can find. If they let you down, you band together with fellow conservatives in your district to unseat them.
The problem is, over the last eight years we quit holding anyone accountable.
WildRose
July 26th, 2009, 9:08 am
The Republicans and Democrats have gotten us into this mess. Do not get caught up in their bs rhetoric. We need a viable third party...now.
Sounds great and just what I was preaching in 96. We even had a billionaire candidate that poured millions of his own dollars into the effort.
The problem is the two parties have succeeded in creating a system where it's financially impossible for a third party candidate for president to succeed, and all but impossible for a third part candidate to succeed in running for the house or senate as well.
If you don't work within the existing system you are simply guaranteeing your own failure.
smyrna
July 26th, 2009, 9:13 am
Sounds great and just what I was preaching in 96. We even had a billionaire candidate that poured millions of his own dollars into the effort.
The problem is the two parties have succeeded in creating a system where it's financially impossible for a third party candidate for president to succeed, and all but impossible for a third part candidate to succeed in running for the house or senate as well.
If you don't work within the existing system you are simply guaranteeing your own failure.
When Ross Perot ran in 92, there was a grass roots effort to get him on the ballots. A grass roots effort is what it will take again to beat this machine, you refer to.
betwixt
July 26th, 2009, 10:25 am
America is begining to stand together for the
<snip>
Voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on eight out of 10 key electoral issues, including, for the second straight month, the top issue of the economy. (http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues)
All Rasmussen polls July 25, 2009
I don't think this necessarily true. The voters now know that spending all that money hasn't helped (or as fast) like the Dem's were stating.
Remember Bush passed the first Stimulus, do you believe that after seeing the economy bounc back he wouldn't go for more?
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 11:42 am
The bill as it stands won't pass you can be assured of that. It would be nice to get Republican input to it and work it out to everyones satisfaction. I don't think Obama really wants it to be a unilateral effort. There's going to be some compromise. Especially in the Senate. But something has to be done about this.
America disagrees - As the most liberal member of Congress Obama voted partisan 99% of the time. He has no interest in the Repubs point of view. When he says he does it is a lie.
53% Say Obama is ‘Partisan Democrat’
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/partisan_politics
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 11:56 am
I don't think this necessarily true. The voters now know that spending all that money hasn't helped (or as fast) like the Dem's were stating.
Remember Bush passed the first Stimulus, do you believe that after seeing the economy bounc back he wouldn't go for more?
Bush F'ed up. I believe Capitalism works without Government bail-outs. I believe the economy would have already corrected its self without the bail-outs and the spendulus.
We have extended the damage. GM should have failed. Survival of the fittest. The banks should have failed. It would have made other banks stronger. Failing banks would have had to liquidate those loans. Other banks could have taken advantage of discounted bulk mortgages. Wow what an opportunity for the banks who had shown restraint during Barney Franks and his band of mental midgets, destruction of the housing market and banking industry.
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 1:39 pm
America disagrees - As the most liberal member of Congress Obama voted partisan 99% of the time. He has no interest in the Repubs point of view. When he says he does it is a lie.
53% Say Obama is ‘Partisan Democrat’
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/partisan_politics
Obama can't pass the bill on his own. You do believe healthcare reform is needed, right?
steerbysteer
July 26th, 2009, 2:38 pm
Obama can't pass the bill on his own. You do believe health care reform is needed, right?
Every business the U.S. Government touches turns to crap.
The only reform I think is needed is a public option were families can get a group discount rate similar to those offered to large corporations. Other than that Government needs to keep out!!!
Only below poverty level citizens should get free health care. Expect the free health care to be rationed and lower quality. I also dont mind the idea of tax incentives for the poor to pay for their own insurance.
I love my insurance and I would hate for anything to change, including being taxed on my benefits, my taxes being raised to pay of anyone else's health care or my insurance rates to go up.
I certainly do not want the Government in charge of my health. OMG please NO!!!
Really I am very happy as things are.
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 3:00 pm
Every business the U.S. Government touches turns to crap.
The only reform I think is needed is a public option were families can get a group discount rate similar to those offered to large corporations. Other than that Government needs to keep out!!!
Only below poverty level citizens should get free health care. Expect the free health care to be rationed and lower quality. I also dont mind the idea of tax incentives for the poor to pay for their own insurance.
I love my insurance and I would hate for anything to change, including being taxed on my benefits, my taxes being raised to pay of anyone else's health care or my insurance rates to go up.
I certainly do not want the Government in charge of my health. OMG please NO!!!
Really I am very happy as things are.
I actually think there is a strategy here by the administration. By moving so fast and making what appears to be radical changes in healthcare, he's facilitating something actually being done about it by getting both sides fired up.
DLaw911
July 26th, 2009, 4:13 pm
I have been watching the polls daily since Obama took office.
I like the trends.
Thank you America!!!Obama is going to hold his office and be there for 8 years. If I were Republicans I would shed your conservative agenda and begin to be less selfish, more progressive, and offer more than mean spirited hate filled transparent lies.
conphu1
July 26th, 2009, 4:18 pm
If I were Republicans I would shed your conservative agenda and begin to be less selfish, more progressive, and offer more than mean spirited hate filled transparent lies.
Even if they did the highlight, do you think people would believe that after all the wonderful wordage they used against their own fellow citizens they had an epiphany in attitude?
DLaw911
July 26th, 2009, 4:19 pm
Maybe not, but Castro was so inspired by Marx he started a Revolution.Another case of a friend of America we turned into our adversary.
steerbysteer
August 8th, 2009, 12:19 am
Obama is going to hold his office and be there for 8 years. If I were Republicans I would shed your conservative agenda and begin to be less selfish, more progressive, and offer more than mean spirited hate filled transparent lies.
That is funny!!!
Obama is a Communist. Many Americans who did not believe this at 1st, now believe. Many Dems are ashamed of the party and are abandon the Dem Party for Independents and the GOP mostly over this out of control spending and the Socialized Medicine.
Socialism is just the stepping stone from Capitalism to Communism. Obama has to take small steps before he can fully implement Communism. If Obama takes large steps too many Americans will catch on. Obama is wheeling in his Trojan horse. Don't be such a sucker.
Obama and the Socialist Party (aka Liberal Democrats) have had a major set back when government medical take-over was seen as what it actually is, Socialized Medicine. Nice try Obama, America is not having it!!!
steerbysteer
August 8th, 2009, 12:21 am
Another case of a friend of America we turned into our adversary.
Castro?
Man you are a kook.
LMAO
FreedomRing
August 8th, 2009, 1:12 am
Obama is going to hold his office and be there for 8 years. If I were Republicans I would shed your conservative agenda and begin to be less selfish, more progressive, and offer more than mean spirited hate filled transparent lies.
You keep believing that.
And let the Democrats in office continue to ignore their constituents while attempting to silence political discourse.
Because you are in for a VERY rude awakening in 2012.
steerbysteer
August 8th, 2009, 1:33 am
You keep believing that.
And let the Democrats in office continue to ignore their constituents while attempting to silence political discourse.
Because you are in for a VERY rude awakening in 2012.
Dont you mean 2010? Bye bye Dems...Commie Obammie will then be reined in.
SpecJet
August 8th, 2009, 2:03 am
Obama is going to hold his office and be there for 8 years. If I were Republicans I would shed your conservative agenda and begin to be less selfish, more progressive, and offer more than mean spirited hate filled transparent lies.
If you where a Republican, you would see how foolish this statement is.
steerbysteer
August 8th, 2009, 2:33 am
Just a guess, but I am betting DLaw911 thinks 9/11 was an inside job. This guy sounds like a real nut.
Originally Posted by DLaw911 http://forums.hannity.com/firestorm/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?p=58370791#post58370791)
Another case of a friend of America (Castro) we turned into our adversary.
LMAO