sgtmac_46
June 23rd, 2009, 8:01 am
It seems that
"More than 900 background checks between February 2004 and February 2009 turned up names on the watch list, and all but 98 were allowed to go through." http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/06/22/national/w125915D51.DTL&type=politics
Old Frankie Lautenberg is on the trail of curing the so-called 'Terrorist gap'......thanks Frankie.......but a few questions arise.......
Is this the SAME terrorist watch list used by the airlines? The one Ted Kennedy is on?
"The Department of Homeland Security tried to explain the incidents. A DHS spokesman said that on one flight Kennedy was misidentified as someone who needed extra screening when going through security, because he was mistakenly identified as someone on a watch list."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/06/terror/main610466.shtml
And lest anyone forget the criteria that DHS has been using lately as to what constitutes a possible 'Terrorist'!
Sorry, Frankie, but I don't trust your intentions on this......because you're a lying sack of ****! Another 'clever' anti-gun scheme under the guise of 'Homeland Security'. http://www.redpills.org/?p=4878
"More than 900 background checks between February 2004 and February 2009 turned up names on the watch list, and all but 98 were allowed to go through." http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/06/22/national/w125915D51.DTL&type=politics
Old Frankie Lautenberg is on the trail of curing the so-called 'Terrorist gap'......thanks Frankie.......but a few questions arise.......
Is this the SAME terrorist watch list used by the airlines? The one Ted Kennedy is on?
"The Department of Homeland Security tried to explain the incidents. A DHS spokesman said that on one flight Kennedy was misidentified as someone who needed extra screening when going through security, because he was mistakenly identified as someone on a watch list."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/04/06/terror/main610466.shtml
And lest anyone forget the criteria that DHS has been using lately as to what constitutes a possible 'Terrorist'!
Sorry, Frankie, but I don't trust your intentions on this......because you're a lying sack of ****! Another 'clever' anti-gun scheme under the guise of 'Homeland Security'. http://www.redpills.org/?p=4878