Obama Issues Correction: Constitution Wrote 2000 Yrs Ago, Agreed Upon By 57 States...

[Stars&Stripes]

... while 10,000 people were being killed when a tornado was destryoing everything in its path in nearby Kansas while this constitution was being agreed upon by those 57 states.

Obama went on to say that this was the tornado that brought Dorothy (along with her dog Toto) to the land of OZ.

:)):)):))

[Stars&Stripes]

What you have been told is false.

The Constitution was not signed by those delegates at the date or the place where your current history books tell you it was.

Obama has now corrected those lies.

It was signed around 2000 years ago, by delegates from 57 states, near Kansas. A tornado raged nearby, killing 10,000 people and that tornado took Dorothy and her dog Toto to the land of OZ.

The Obamessiah, (a "sort of God," according to Evan Thomas, Editor of Newsweak) the Lord Most Merciful, has given us all (through his infinite wisdom) his correction. His/This correction of the history books is true, and may it stand forever.

[animalnut]

As much as I disagree with Obama's policies, this sounds ridiculously far-fetched. Link? Or is this a joke and I'm missin' it?

[Stars&Stripes]

No libs to hail the truth that Obama has proclaimed?

Whatever happened to "yes we can?"

Yeah, "yes we can" help the crickets to chirp.

Libs, Obama is an idiot, regardless of what you may tell yourselves and others.

Still no libs posting here on this thread...

Uh oh, here come the crickets...

<crickets chirping...loudly>

[Stars&Stripes]

As much as I disagree with Obama's policies, this sounds ridiculously far-fetched. Link?

You haven't seen the youtube clips here at Hannity Washinton Poitics forum and at youtube itself of Obama's comments about the constitution, or 10,000 people dying in Kansas from a tornado (he said this while campaigning in the primaries against Hillary), and you haven't seen the clip where he says that there are 57 states?

My, my, where have you been?

[Mobulis]

Since people assert that the constitution is based on Christian values, which come from the bible, which was written about 2000 yrs ago isn't he right?:whistle:

[Stars&Stripes]

Since people assert that the constitution is based on Christian values, which come from the bible, which was written about 2000 yrs ago isn't he right?:whistle:

Oh my goodness. I didn't think about that...

So he is right about how delegates from 57 states signed it! He is also right about how a tornado (which took Dorothy an Toto to the land of OZ) raged nearby, killing 10,000 people!!!

:))

Lord Most Merciful, Barack Obamessiah, has indeed shared with us his vast knowledge and wisdom!

:)):))

[noko]

And yes where he also ment his wife to be, the wicked witch of the West who was against the Witch of the North, Palin.

[Stars&Stripes]

And yes where he also ment his wife to be, the wicked witch of the West who was against the Witch of the North, Palin.

His wife - The wicked witch of the West - does have a manly build. :))

"My, my, wicked witch of the West, what big arms you have," said Little Red Riding Hood. :)):))

"The better to help my husband squeeze all of your life-savings out of you," the wicked witch of the west replied.

The witch of the North, though - quite beautiful - like Sarah Palin.

[noko]

lol :))
Real jokes makes people laugh.

57 states, wonder if he was including Venezuela, North Korean, Iran, Vietnam, Cuba, tin-but-too and of course OZ :whistle:

[johnjay1788]

As much as I disagree with Obama's policies, this sounds ridiculously far-fetched. Link? Or is this a joke and I'm missin' it?

Constitution is twenty centuries old...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiRhHqlzaG4

57 states...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws

[muhadeeb99]

I think Obama was refering to Hammurabi and his codes. Even Obama might say it was flawed and inefficient. Obama is starting to show how intelligent he really is. He is almost going to the same level as Biden

[Charlie A]

He's not really a numbers guy, is he?

[GA_LP]

I think Obama was refering to Hammurabi and his codes. Even Obama might say it was flawed and inefficient. Obama is starting to show how intelligent he really is. He is almost going to the same level as BidenThe only problem with that interpretation is that Hammurabi's Code was introduced circa 1790 BCE, or nearly 3800 years ago. So even then he's still nearly 1800 years off the mark.

ETA: Kinda wierd - Hammurabi 1790 BCE, US Constitution 1789 CE; Coincidence? (Of course, but hey, why waste a good conspiracy theory?)

[tha malcontent™]

He's not really a numbers guy, is he?

Unlike Farrakkan...

:)

peace...

[who]

Constitution is twenty centuries old...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiRhHqlzaG4

<...>
He never said the "Constitution is twenty centuries old."

Why do people feel they need to misrepresent the facts? Do you think it helps your cause?

[Socrates]

He never said the "Constitution is twenty centuries old."

Why do people feel they need to misrepresent the facts? Do you think it helps your cause?

“Of the many responsibilities granted to a president by our Constitution, few are more serious or more consequential than selecting a Supreme Court justice. The members of our highest court are granted life tenure, often serving long after the presidents who appointed them. And they are charged with the vital task of applying principles put to paper more than 20 centuries ago to some of the most difficult questions of our time.”
What principles "put to paper" more than 20 centuries ago is the SCOTUS tasked with applying?

[CrusaderFrank]

Mustard? On a hamburger? Seriously?

[who]

“Of the many responsibilities granted to a president by our Constitution, few are more serious or more consequential than selecting a Supreme Court justice. The members of our highest court are granted life tenure, often serving long after the presidents who appointed them. And they are charged with the vital task of applying principles put to paper more than 20 centuries ago to some of the most difficult questions of our time.”
What principles "put to paper" more than 20 centuries ago is the SCOTUS tasked with applying?
This was already hashed over in the other thread.

http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1506721

I'm not going to reiterate what I've already said.

I will simply ask you read the other thread and note:
He never said the words in the quotes.

[super cool ski instructor]

So...these are the kind of threads that pop up at 4 in the morning around here? :confused:

[Socrates]

This was already hashed over in the other thread.

http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?t=1506721

I'm not going to reiterate what I've already said.

I will simply ask you read the other thread and note:
He never said the words in the quotes.

He most certainly said what I put in my post.

[who]

He most certainly said what I put in my post.
I was refrring to this:

"Originally Posted by johnjay1788 http://forums.hannity.com/firestorm/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?p=55936201#post55936201)
Constitution is twenty centuries old..."

He never said the "Constitution is twenty centuries old."

[Socrates]

So...these are the kind of threads that pop up at 4 in the morning around here? :confused:

The mods should open up another forum and call it "What if Bush had said this..."

:))

[Socrates]

I was refrring to this:

"Originally Posted by johnjay1788 http://forums.hannity.com/firestorm/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://forums.hannity.com/showthread.php?p=55936201#post55936201)
Constitution is twenty centuries old..."

He never said the "Constitution is twenty centuries old."

So what principles put to paper 20 centuries ago was he referring to?

[who]

So what principles put to paper 20 centuries ago was he referring to?
http://forums.hannity.com/showpost.php?p=55946321&postcount=19

Pay attention to the third line.