View Full Version : Oberman
DuckSoupe
April 28th, 2009, 5:55 pm
Oberman wants to waterboard Sean for a thousand a minute. :boohoo: Herr Oberman would relish it I am sure.
Sean I would have Sarah Palin hold the money,don't trust the jerk
Ex_Spy_Guy
April 28th, 2009, 6:04 pm
is a dumbass...
id kick olbertools ass....for a peanutbutter sandwhich.
that would bring his ratings to at least 6 since my mom would finally watch his show.
PyramidBuilder
April 28th, 2009, 10:13 pm
[Olbermann] is a dumbass...
[I'd] kick [O]lbertool[']s ass....for a peanutbutter [sic] sandwhich [sic].
[T]hat would bring his ratings to at least 6[,] since my mom would finally watch his show. [D+. You can do better - see me after class.]
You understand that the guy has the #1-rated show on MSNBC and is watched by millions of people every week? He's quite successful, however much you dislike him.
CogitoErgoSum
April 28th, 2009, 10:23 pm
Hannity said he would endure water boarding to show support for the troops, Olbermann supported Hannity's claim buy throwing in $1000.00 per minuet.
Since then, Hannity has been silent.
"Charles Grodin was challenging Hannity on the issue on Fox last week, and asked whether he would consent to be water boarded.
"Sure," Hannity said. "I'll do it for charity ... I'll do it for the troops' families."
Olbermann replied by offering a "$1,000 to the families of U.S. troops for every second Hannity withstood the technique."
Come on Sean...Show your support.
Ex_Spy_Guy
April 28th, 2009, 11:45 pm
You understand that the guy has the #1-rated show on MSNBC and is watched by millions of people every week? He's quite successful, however much you dislike him.
lol, Olberman is a jackass and so are the tools that watch him.
Ex_Spy_Guy
April 29th, 2009, 12:35 am
if you guys like olbertool so much...why dol you hang out here instead of Olbertools forum?
jungulator
April 29th, 2009, 1:16 am
You understand that the guy has the #1-rated show on MSNBC and is watched by millions of people every week? He's quite successful, however much you dislike him.
I don't think that many people watch MSNBC.
EmmanuelGoldstein
April 29th, 2009, 2:07 am
Oberman wants to waterboard Sean for a thousand a minute. :boohoo: Herr Oberman would relish it I am sure.
Sean I would have Sarah Palin hold the money,don't trust the jerk
No he doesn't.
After Sean said he'd be waterboarded for charity, Olbermann offered $1000 for each second Sean lasted.
sgdp
April 29th, 2009, 2:12 am
Olbermann is just like a lot of the cable news programs run during primetime.
PyramidBuilder
April 29th, 2009, 3:07 am
lol, Olberman is a jackass and so are the tools that watch him.
"lol, I'm not going to bother to address your points, but just repeat nearly the same thing I said before."
Ex_Spy_Guy
April 29th, 2009, 11:28 am
"lol, I'm not going to bother to address your points, but just repeat nearly the same thing I said before."
exactly
lol
Olbertool is a jackass with a following so sickly that he has to michael moore his way thru life
uncledoom
April 29th, 2009, 12:22 pm
You understand that the guy has the #1-rated show on MSNBC and is watched by millions of people every week? He's quite successful, however much you dislike him.
LOL...I question if millins watch MSNBC in general. Any data to back up this assertion?
RickRhetoric
April 29th, 2009, 1:22 pm
I wouldn't want to watch Sean being waterboarded, but I'd sure enjoy seeing the ever finger-wagging, shrieking and interruptive Shrill O'Reilly being waterboarded.:)):)):))
Ex_Spy_Guy
April 29th, 2009, 1:34 pm
ill take olbertools challenge....set it up....but instead of the money...for every second I last...I get a second in the octagon with him....no pads.
SUVRon
April 29th, 2009, 2:21 pm
You understand that the guy has the #1-rated show on MSNBC and is watched by millions of people every week? He's quite successful, however much you dislike him.
It'a not hard to get the #1 show on MSNBC. All you need is 15 viewers and you're the top dog over there. You couldn't add all their shows together and get a million viewers.
LoneStarHero
April 29th, 2009, 2:32 pm
Olbermann is more successful than Michael Savage and Phil Donahue were.
Fox News personalities and Olbermann both make me cringe sometimes at some of their wanton distortions.
Marleysdaddy
April 29th, 2009, 4:32 pm
LOL...I question if millins [sic] watch MSNBC in general. Any data to back up this assertion?
Originally posted by SUVRon
It'a [sic] not hard to get the #1 show on MSNBC. All you need is 15 viewers and you're the top dog over there. You couldn't add all their shows together and get a million viewers.
FYI - the following graph based on 2008 data clearly shows that Countdown regularly draws more than one million viewers...the data also suggest an upward trend.
http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/051508oreillyolbermann.thumbnail.gif
Ex_Spy_Guy
April 29th, 2009, 4:50 pm
Dammit, do you ever think or do you just project your every thought onto the world, as if your mere thought reflects reality? And do you understand the difference between average and aggregate viewership?
Olbertool doesnt understand the difference between dog **** and food....but hey....
PhilRocksinOHIO.
April 29th, 2009, 5:14 pm
He'll find out the hard way. I took care of the quote....thanks Marley.
uncledoom
April 29th, 2009, 5:25 pm
Cool...I got to see a COH before deletion....
Things must be slow in DU today.
PhilRocksinOHIO.
April 29th, 2009, 5:29 pm
To quote Edith Bunker: "Goodbye Archie...have a nice day." :mrgreen:
uncledoom
April 29th, 2009, 5:33 pm
FYI - the following graph based on 2008 data clearly shows that Countdown regularly draws more than one million viewers...the data also suggest an upward trend.
http://tvbythenumbers.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/051508oreillyolbermann.thumbnail.gif
1.4 - 1.5 million doesn't really qualify as "millions of viewers"...that's more like several hundred thousand..
Marleysdaddy
April 29th, 2009, 6:20 pm
1.4 - 1.5 million doesn't really qualify as "millions of viewers"...that's more like several hundred thousand..
That graph was only for ONE SHOW on MSNBC (your comment was about MSNBC in general, not just Countdown)
If the viewers of the 23 hours of other programming on that station (including the late showing of Countdown) total more than 500,000, would you consider that "millions of viewers"?
uncledoom
April 29th, 2009, 6:31 pm
That graph was only for ONE SHOW on MSNBC (your comment was about MSNBC in general, not just Countdown)
If the viewers of the 23 hours of other programming on that station (including the late showing of Countdown) total more than 500,000, would you consider that "millions of viewers"?
http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/ratings/top-news/cable-news
Looking at the stats for yesterday prime time for all of MSNBC, they are not even at 1 million.
Marleysdaddy
April 29th, 2009, 7:43 pm
http://tvbythenumbers.com/category/ratings/top-news/cable-news
Looking at the stats for yesterday prime time for all of MSNBC, they are not even at 1 million.
Can you explain to me how a station has more viewers during prime time than it does for the total day? Are those numbers hourly averages?
P2+ Prime Time
FNC – 2,516,000 viewers
P2+ Total Day
FNC – 1,345,000 viewers
Regardless, if 947,000 people watched MSNBC from 8 to 11 Eastern Time, I'd say it's a safe bet that 1,053,000 tuned in some time during the other 21 hours of the day...
uncledoom
April 29th, 2009, 10:16 pm
Can you explain to me how a station has more viewers during prime time than it does for the total day? Are those numbers hourly averages?
P2+ Prime Time
FNC – 2,516,000 viewers
P2+ Total Day
FNC – 1,345,000 viewers
Regardless, if 947,000 people watched MSNBC from 8 to 11 Eastern Time, I'd say it's a safe bet that 1,053,000 tuned in some time during the other 21 hours of the day...
Probably because more people are at work during the day than during primetime. But at the end of the day 1,053,000 is million singular...not plural.
Ex_Spy_Guy
April 29th, 2009, 11:05 pm
I'm sorry.....
thats apparent.
RWReaganfan
April 29th, 2009, 11:16 pm
You understand that the guy has the #1-rated show on MSNBC and is watched by millions of people every week? He's quite successful, however much you dislike him.
Being the #1 rated show on a network that is watched only by people with room temperature IQs is NOT an accomplishment. That's like being the captain of a garbage scow. Sure, there are people below you, but the work still stinks!
newyorkjetsfan
April 30th, 2009, 2:41 am
Why should Hannity listen to Olberjerk?
What qualities does Oldermann have to be an "objective journalist?"
LoneStarHero
April 30th, 2009, 5:36 am
Why should Hannity listen to Olberjerk?
What qualities does Oldermann have to be an "objective journalist?"
There is less money in that. Duh!
Marleysdaddy
April 30th, 2009, 9:20 am
Probably because more people are at work during the day than during primetime.
That wouldn't make the total viewers in a 24 hour period a lower number than the viewers in a 3 hour period within that 24 hours.
But at the end of the day 1,053,000 is million singular...not plural.
add it to 947,000 :think:
uncledoom
April 30th, 2009, 11:33 am
That wouldn't make the total viewers in a 24 hour period a lower number than the viewers in a 3 hour period within that 24 hours.
add it to 947,000 :think:
Only if the theory is the numbers for prime time are does not already include the daytime number.
But in any event, that would give MSNBC exactly 2 million and that definitely put MSNBC into having "millions" of viewers. Its like having $2 instead of $1.
PhilRocksinOHIO.
April 30th, 2009, 4:49 pm
Why should Hannity listen to Olberjerk?
What qualities does Oldermann have to be an "objective journalist?" Liberals can't be objective.
Marleysdaddy
April 30th, 2009, 5:14 pm
Liberals can't be objective.
uhh, humans can't be objective, at least not completely