View Full Version : Janet Napolitano is a hypocrite
Conservative16
April 14th, 2009, 9:11 pm
Isn't the term "radical right wing extremist" offensive? She is on record to use more "politically correct" terms, such as "man made disaster" for terrorism. So instead of "radical right wing extremist" shouldn't she use "Constitution obeying people with a core set values and beliefs" Oh wait thats a bit too nice...
flashycopy
April 14th, 2009, 9:16 pm
How about Tim Mcveyers or David Koreshers
Greyghost
April 14th, 2009, 9:35 pm
How about Tim Mcveyers or David Koreshers
I suppose you think this is a good thing the government is doing? You should easily fit into the jackboots they issue you.:rolleyes:
agent_86
April 14th, 2009, 9:40 pm
I think jackboots have been given a bad rap...
East TN Welshman
April 14th, 2009, 9:40 pm
Notice how often they use the words terror, terrorist, or terrorism in that document, then proceed to broadbrush anyone with any issue with this Administration with those terms.
This is the same Administration that is no longer willing to refer to AQM or Hamas or anyone related to them as terrorists. Yet they find it ever so easy to label those who disagree with them using that label.
I guess the Taliban can be redeemed in Bowbama's eyes. But Mark Levin? Well...he's clearly a threat to the nation and should be watched.
flashycopy
April 14th, 2009, 9:42 pm
I suppose you think this is a good thing the government is doing? You should easily fit into the jackboots they issue you.:rolleyes:
Free boots ,I love this country
dittoheadAZ
April 14th, 2009, 9:42 pm
How about Tim Mcveyers or David Koreshers
How about Ted Kazinskys or Josef Stalins or Ted Kennedys or Robert Byrds...
Oh wait, those are all LEFT-wingers.
agent_86
April 14th, 2009, 9:43 pm
Notice how often they use the words terror, terrorist, or terrorism in that document, then proceed to broadbrush anyone with any issue with this Administration with those terms.
This is the same Administration that is no longer willing to refer to AQM or Hamas or anyone related to them as terrorists. Yet they find it ever so easy to label those who disagree with them using that label.
I guess the Taliban can be redeemed in Bowbama's eyes. But Mark Levin? Well...he's clearly a threat to the nation and should be watched.
They are clearly defining the enemy to be citizens. Ask the jews how this goes from here.
dittoheadAZ
April 14th, 2009, 9:43 pm
But Mark Levin? Well...he's clearly a threat to the nation and should be watched.
Sounds good - put him on the television, and I'll watch him every time! :mrgreen:
notluzn
April 14th, 2009, 9:45 pm
How about Tim Mcveyers or David Koreshers
What the Hell are you yapping about? Those n guys were not republicans and didn't do anything under a Political Shield. Get a new story pal because your lost like a puppy in an Ocean
PaleoPaul
April 14th, 2009, 9:47 pm
We're on the road to tyranny...disfrutense!
flashycopy
April 14th, 2009, 9:56 pm
What the Hell are you yapping about? Those n guys were not republicans and didn't do anything under a Political Shield. Get a new story pal because your lost like a puppy in an Ocean
you need to work on your metaphors.
goodlife
April 15th, 2009, 12:14 am
you need to work on your metaphors.
You need to work on not being such a troll.
It's getting quite tiresome.
:rolleyes:
Maelstrom
April 15th, 2009, 12:16 am
Isn't the term "radical right wing extremist" offensive? She is on record to use more "politically correct" terms, such as "man made disaster" for terrorism. So instead of "radical right wing extremist" shouldn't she use "Constitution obeying people with a core set values and beliefs" Oh wait thats a bit too nice...
She is not a hypocrite.
She is at war against specific segments of American society, as is the rest of Obama's Administration.
Maelstrom
April 15th, 2009, 12:17 am
Free boots ,I love this country
No, you clearly do NOT love this country.
You love what liberals think they can make of it.
muhadeeb99
April 15th, 2009, 11:48 am
It seems that DHS is taking the buckshot approach as is Obama in dealing with home grown disgruntled and constitutional protesting individual.
Obviously, Janet Napolitano does or is not taking a focused approach to protecting the American public.
ModerateVoice
April 15th, 2009, 11:58 am
No, you clearly do NOT love this country.
You love what liberals think they can make of it.
You're wasting your breath. He's never posted anything beyond a drive-by partisan attack....I called him on it last week and he threatened to put me on his ignore list. Oooooooohhhh!
bigtwnvin
April 15th, 2009, 12:04 pm
They are clearly defining the enemy to be citizens. Ask the jews how this goes from here.
For a while there the focus was on "the rich" and those greedy CEO types. The middle class outraged over government spending, taxation and out of control bureaucracy are the new comrade Maobama targets.
How dare we even think of exercising our God given 1st Amendment Rights!! :eh: