Rep. Stevens

[FREE DON]

So Rep. Stevens was found not guilty DA ! it is just more of the same the DEOCRAPS did every thing to win at all cost ! NEW ELECTION IN ORDER.

[Samm]

So Rep. Stevens was found not guilty DA ! it is just more of the same the DEOCRAPS did every thing to win at all cost ! NEW ELECTION IN ORDER.

1) Stevens was a Senator, not a Representative
2) Stevens was not found not guilty; the US AG dismissed the indictment and asked the Judge to vacate the conviction.
3) The US DA who prosecuted (persecuted?) Stevens was working for a Republican Administration, not the Democrats.
4) **** happens... There was nothing improper about the election; there is no legal justification for a new election.
5) Get your facts straight prior to posting... :rolleyes:

[Cav Scout]

Ouch...

[pattyk]

so now can they just stop with the ethics charges against Palin?

these lefties are totally out of control

[Samm]

so now can they just stop with the ethics charges against Palin?

these lefties are totally out of control

Careful Patty... it is the "lefties" who dropped the charges against Stevens. ;)

[RickRhetoric]

Stevens was persecuted and prosecuted just long enough for his Democratic opponent to win the election. Now the Democrats are saying he's not guilty. Very convenient -- and clever too!

[supreme_war_Pig]

Stevens was persecuted and prosecuted just long enough for his Democratic opponent to win the election. Now the Democrats are saying he's not guilty. Very convenient -- and clever too!

And the Right wing rewriting of history commences: a Republican administration went after him, a Democratic administration dropped the charges.

[supreme_war_Pig]

Stevens was persecuted and prosecuted just long enough for his Democratic opponent to win the election. Now the Democrats are saying he's not guilty. Very convenient -- and clever too!

So why do you suppose the highly politicized attorneys from the Bush administration went after a fellow Republican?

[Samm]

Stevens was persecuted and prosecuted just long enough for his Democratic opponent to win the election. Now the Democrats are saying he's not guilty. Very convenient -- and clever too!

Those prosecutors were working under the supervision of a Republican US Attorney General... he could have stepped in any time he wanted. This conspiracy is bigger than anyone knew. :rolleyes:

[Cav Scout]

The UN did it!

[RickRhetoric]

So why do you suppose the highly politicized attorneys from the Bush administration went after a fellow Republican?

They naively assumed that a Democratic court would be fair and just.

[Cav Scout]

Those prosecutors were working under the supervision of a Republican US Attorney General... he could have stepped in any time he wanted. This conspiracy is bigger than anyone knew. :rolleyes:

I hate them hormonal conspiracy's!

[EmmanuelGoldstein]

see below :)

[EmmanuelGoldstein]

1) Stevens was a Senator, not a Representative
2) Stevens was not found not guilty; the US AG dismissed the indictment and asked the Judge to vacate the conviction.
3) The US DA who prosecuted (persecuted?) Stevens was working for a Republican Administration, not the Democrats.
4) **** happens... There was nothing improper about the election; there is no legal justification for a new election.
5) Get your facts straight prior to posting... :rolleyes:
:lol:

I should have read the second post...

[Hereintheusa]

How come everyone is accusing the Democrats and Obama being involved in some conspiracy in this issue but ignore it was a Republican administration that went after him?