PDA

View Full Version : house to vote soon on chairman maobama's 3.6 trillion budget


spinach
April 2nd, 2009, 6:29 pm
which of course....will have a huge deficit.

Revenue is not even gonna be CLOSE to what the liberal cretins are expecting. In fact, the CBO, which is critical of the Maobama spending, is actually far far too rosy itself.

This budget is the coup de grace.....


they are arguing stuff right now.
dunno when the actual vote will come.

John Boehner is showing a chart right now on the budget.

RickRhetoric
April 2nd, 2009, 6:49 pm
Voting on it is symbolic and a joke.

It'll pass with flying colors.

dad49er
April 2nd, 2009, 6:52 pm
Voting on it is symbolic and a joke.

It'll pass with flying colors.

Easily.
Even Rush conceded that this morning.

croupier101
April 2nd, 2009, 7:00 pm
easy pass.

spinach
April 2nd, 2009, 7:04 pm
I am happy that there will be a record of this idiocy.

Hopefully not one GOP will vote for the liberal idiocy bill.

roger teekell
April 2nd, 2009, 7:05 pm
easy pass.

If you were in Congress Croup..Would you vote for it??

roger teekell
April 2nd, 2009, 7:08 pm
I am happy that there will be a record of this idiocy.

Hopefully not one GOP will vote for the liberal idiocy bill.

Just heard Evan Bayh is opposing this bill...

We will have to wait and see though..

dad49er
April 2nd, 2009, 7:08 pm
If you were in Congress Croup..Would you vote for it??

I'm not Croup, but I would.
It's not perfect but what spending bill is?
All things considered.

Getty Girl
April 2nd, 2009, 7:17 pm
I'm not Croup, but I would.
It's not perfect but what spending bill is?
All things considered.


the point is there should be no spending, you can't bail, borrow and spend your way to prosperity.

Tim Mc
April 2nd, 2009, 7:41 pm
which of course....will have a huge deficit.

Revenue is not even gonna be CLOSE to what the liberal cretins are expecting. In fact, the CBO, which is critical of the Maobama spending, is actually far far too rosy itself.

This budget is the coup de grace.....


they are arguing stuff right now.
dunno when the actual vote will come.

John Boehner is showing a chart right now on the budget.

CBO President's Budget Projections

http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/100xx/doc10014/03-20-PresidentBudget.pdf

2008
Debt held by the public - $5,803,000,000,000 or 40.8% of GDP
GDP - $14,222,000,000,000

2009 revenues - $2,159,000,000,000
2009 outlays - $4,004,000,000,000
2009 budget deficit - $1,845,000,000,000
Debt held by the public - $7,987,000,000,000 or 56.8% of GDP
projected GDP $14,057,000,000,000

2010 revenues - $2,289,000,000,000
2010 outlays - $3,669,000,000,000
2010 budget deficit - $1,379,000,000,000
Debt held by the public - $9,319,000,000,000 or 64.7% of GDP
projected GDP - $14,405,000,000,000

2011 revenues - $2,286,000,000,000
2011 outlays - $3,556,000,000,000
2011 budget deficit - $970,000,000,000
Debt held by the public $10,292,000,000,000 or 68.3% of GDP
projected GDP - $15,061,000,000,000

2012 revenues - $2,917,000,000,000
2012 outlays - $3,575,000,000,000
2012 budget deficit - $658,000,000,000
Debt held by the public $11,055,000,000,000 or 70.1% of GDP
projected GDP - $15,774,000,000,000

Tim Mc
April 2nd, 2009, 8:09 pm
No reaction to the numbers?

roger teekell
April 2nd, 2009, 8:17 pm
I'm not Croup, but I would.
It's not perfect but what spending bill is?
All things considered.

You would...

Are not MANY things in this budget going right into the "Baseline"???

You do realize they will be unsustainable don't you??

roger teekell
April 2nd, 2009, 8:18 pm
No reaction to the numbers?

I personally was speechless...

Nice post though..

spinach
April 2nd, 2009, 8:36 pm
No reaction to the numbers?


the CBO's numbers are FAR too rosy.
Watch and see. They are basing their numbers on a potential economic recovery at some time.

Keep a copy of their numbers on hand.....and watch what happens to the REAL numbers later this year.

spinach
April 2nd, 2009, 8:40 pm
no GOP's voted for the insane liberal spending budget.

20 democrats also voted no.

the bill passed, the communists made sure it would
232-196


the bipartisan support was not enough to defeat the communists.

OIVORY
April 2nd, 2009, 8:49 pm
No reaction to the numbers?

I was blinded by the zeros...

I also dislike the way forum doesn't let your format the numbers...

If anyone knows a way to format tables like that, I'd love to hear about it.