Mark Levin's Tea Party

[Andrew1218]

On March 21st at the Huntington "Book Revue", Mark Levin will be having his book signing with Sean Hannity. I think it would be outstanding if we show our support for Mark Levin by showing up in Huntington, Long Island this weekend. If you appreciate what Mark Levin has done for us, then please take the time to go this Saturday.

It would be a great gesture to a man that speaks the truth on our behalf every day.

Also, if you are not familiar with Huntington, it is a very nice town with a lot of nice restaurants, shops and yes, bars! So, not only would it be in support of a guy that is on the front lines for us, but it would be a fun way to spend your Saturday night.


N.B. I am not associated with Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, the Huntington Book Club, etc. I do not live in Huntington and I am not a member of the Chamber of Commerce. I am just a guy who would have gone crazy by now if Mark and Sean were not on the radio.

[Andrew1218]

Here's more info;

http://www.bookrevue.com/

This appears to be the website and they have the 5:00pm book signing advertised.

Sat, March 21st
5pm

MARK
LEVIN

BOOK REVUE
313 NEW YORK AVENUE
HUNTINGTON, NY 11743
phone: 631.271.1442
fax: 631.271.5890



website:
bookrevue.com


Hope to see you there!!!

[Andrew1218]

This Saturday. Please try to make it.

[CaraC]

Andrew, thanks for the info. My husband and I drove about an hour to Huntington. We got there late, at about 5:30. The line to get into the bookstore was extremely long. It wrapped all the way around the corner of the very long block, then around the next corner and the next, until it wrapped almost all the way around back to the bookstore from the other side.

The line was too long for us, so we went to dinner and came back in about an hour and a half - and the line was still almost as long as before. We had come out to show support for Mark rather than to see him in person, and as it was clear he had tons of support, at that point we went home. Although we didn't get to meet him, we were very happy to see such an amazing turnout. So many people are aware of and appreciate the great work he's doing: speaking out strongly for liberty in America.

[SBJames]

Cara - an hours drive is time and money, how great that you are willing to put your opinions and feeling into action, that is the only way forward from where we are at now that offers any real hope that I can see, citizen engagement.

Shared your note with Mark and Sean, I wanted them to see a few stories from that evening and yours showed what it was all about especially well, you did not need or want the personal recognition, it was about the love you have for your country and the common sense message of where we have gone off track and where the way back lies.

thanks! Hope we have a chance to see you and shake your hand next time.
SB James

[CaraC]

SBJames, thank you for your nice note. I do hope to shake your hand next time, too!

Did you hear Dr. Orly Taitz on the G. Gordon Liddy Show yesterday? Here's a link to his site where her segment is mentioned and to the relevant podcast:

3-23-09 HR 1: http://www.radioamerica.org/POD_ggl.htm

Podcast: http://feeds.radioamerica.org/podcast/GGL/audio/Liddy_mon_23-03-09_H1.mp3

I urge you, Mark and Sean to talk to Orly Taitz (defendourfreedoms.us (http://defendourfreedoms.us)) and review the dossier (http://defendourfreedoms.us/2009/03/08/dossier-of-suspected-criminal-activity-and-a-demand-to-appoint-a-special-prosecutor.aspx.) she has presented to the Supreme Court and other officials.

[Andrew1218]

CaraC--It is very comforting to know that great people like you are out there. My four kids will be reading Mark's book, and I will be giving copies to my extended family and friends. Mark is 100% right about his call to action, and supporting his message and book is a fantastic start to the movement re-establishing the Founding Principles.

May God Bless you and your family always. ( I hope you enjoyed your dinner!)

[CaraC]

CaraC--It is very comforting to know that great people like you are out there. My four kids will be reading Mark's book, and I will be giving copies to my extended family and friends. Mark is 100% right about his call to action, and supporting his message and book is a fantastic start to the movement re-establishing the Founding Principles.

May God Bless you and your family always. ( I hope you enjoyed your dinner!)

Thanks, Andrew. It's comforting to know great people like you are out there, too. All freedom-loving patriotic Americans need to work together to fight the oppression Washington is trying to subject us to.

[soulhunter59]

The liberals have been fighting against oppressive government all throughout history. Great figures in history have been pushed aside in recent years and I find it's important that they be remembered. The father of bureaucracy Confucius used his new found principles to take away power from an oppressive emperor. Liberals also freed the slaves as well as giving women the right to vote. Yes, Lincoln was a republican but back then, republicans were liberals.

Conservatives on the other hand conservatives support people like Caesar who did everything he could to take away government and give it to the military. As a result, Rome was no longer a democracy and it became an empire. In U.S. history conservatives rebelled against the U.S. government like you are doing now. I would consider your movement to be more civilized than the first time so I'll give you that. They broke into the tax collectors house, tarred and feathered him, burned his house to the ground and tormented his family. As a result, the big bad president at the time saddled up and shut down the rebellion himself.

I don't know about you guys but I thought Washington was a good president. How could you guys say such things about him? Shame on you. :naughty:

[No one of Consequence]

SoulHunter,

A) What are you talking about?
B) What are you smoking?

[goodgod]

TEA PARTY IN MILLTOWN, NJ, 12 NOON APRIL 15th ( THE DAY YOUR TAXES ARE DUE) in front of Borough Hall
bring a sign and a tea bag....then we will be sending the tea bags to Lautenberg the zombie and Menendez the mindless. :think::):boohoo:
I WONDER HOW MANY OF THE POLITICIANS WE INVITED WILL SHOW UP?

[soulhunter59]

TEA PARTY IN MILLTOWN, NJ, 12 NOON APRIL 15th ( THE DAY YOUR TAXES ARE DUE) in front of Borough Hall
bring a sign and a tea bag....then we will be sending the tea bags to Lautenberg the zombie and Menendez the mindless. :think::):boohoo:
I WONDER HOW MANY OF THE POLITICIANS WE INVITED WILL SHOW UP?


These Tea parties are nothing but Right wing conservative propaganda. You think that this is like the Boston Tea party when in reality this is a second whiskey and shay's rebellion. I just hope it wont come to the same result. This time Obama is going to play the role of George Washington.

[PaulRevere]

I wouldn't be surprised ....This tyrant would attack his own citizens before taking steps against rogue countries like N. Korea....After all he is the one who told Europe world problems have been our fault and bragged about letting Terrorist detainees free from Guantanomo....

[Philabuster]

These Tea parties are nothing but Right wing conservative propaganda. You think that this is like the Boston Tea party when in reality this is a second whiskey and shay's rebellion. I just hope it wont come to the same result. This time Obama is going to play the role of George Washington.

I am convinced that you don't know what the hell you're talking about. It's not propaganda, it's the truth, maybe you just can't handle it. If you don't approve of the Tea Parties then don't come.

[goodgod]

just imagine if everyone thought like you back in rev.war time, we would all be bowing to the queen now. Except for michele she can hug the queen, barf barf. OH AND PLEASE DON'T COME TO ANY TEA PARTIES CAUSE YOU MIGHT HAVE YOUR FEELINGS HURT BY SOME OF THE RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT YOU CAN GO TO A NICE PEACFULL RALLY LIKE THE ONE IN ENGLAND AT THE G20... these tea parties are nothing but right wing conservative propaganda. You think that this is like the boston tea party when in reality this is a second whiskey and shay's rebellion. I just hope it wont come to the same result. This time obama is going to play the role of george washington.

[soulhunter59]

just imagine if everyone thought like you back in rev.war time, we would all be bowing to the queen now. Except for michele she can hug the queen, barf barf. OH AND PLEASE DON'T COME TO ANY TEA PARTIES CAUSE YOU MIGHT HAVE YOUR FEELINGS HURT BY SOME OF THE RIGHT WING PROPAGANDA, BUT YOU CAN GO TO A NICE PEACFULL RALLY LIKE THE ONE IN ENGLAND AT THE G20...

Considering the founding fathers were strong liberal protesters and the conservatives back then were called loyalists. The revolution was due to bad business by charging high quality prices for substandard products. As a result, the people protested and boycotted those products. Unfortunately, they were still sending and charging the people for those products. So one night a bunch of guys got drunk dressed up like Native Americans then marched over to the ship yard and threw the tea overboard. Just so you know liberals have used this method to protest all threw history. Many unarmed protesters even faced the end of a gun and died for what they believed in. As a result, it was a calling cry for many revolutionists.


Oh and it's not truth its spin. Every time I hear these pundits talk they don't seem to tell the whole story. My friend Joe says it better than I can so see for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owef22B1Nso&feature=channel_page

[goodgod]

:flag:thanks so much for the history lesson but what the hell does that have to do with a nut that goes to foreign countries and puts down MY COUNTRY if I didn't know better i would think he's related to Jimmy the peanut man. I sure wish you would come to our tea party in Milltown, NJ on april 15th at 12 noon so I could see what a smart ass looks like in person. :flag:

[soulhunter59]

Well I smell something fishy with that story but unfortunately my studies as a mathematician have been keeping me busy as of late. I do know that Hillary Clinton had just finished her tour so I was wondering why he would bother. I think she has been ****ing people off so other countries have been starting to pull their money out of the United States. Obama is trying to get other countries to trust the United States again and apologizing for our disrespect.

The reason for the history lesson is because I thought conservatives called them Tea parties to claim that they are emulating the Boston Tea Party. This is not true but there you have it.

[Databyter]

The liberals have been fighting against oppressive government all throughout history. Great figures in history have been pushed aside in recent years and I find it's important that they be remembered. The father of bureaucracy Confucius used his new found principles to take away power from an oppressive emperor. Liberals also freed the slaves as well as giving women the right to vote. Yes, Lincoln was a republican but back then, republicans were liberals. Your ignorance on this subject is astounding.

The Origin of the Republican party was the anti-slavery party.

We fought the Southern Democrats tooth and nail at every single ammendment.

Martin Luther King was a Republican also and that was a long time after Lincoln. By the way, he was a Conservative and he would very strongly be opposed to everything Obama is doing right now.

You are one to talk about propoganda.

You are so full of revisionist history that you don't realize that it is STILL the Democrats who enslave not only the Blacks but all of us.

The Republicans are still the party of civil rights.

The D's continue to want to enslave the minorities, only now they don't use ropes and plows, but entitlements and governmental dependency caused by flawed social engineering.

Only now they aren't content with just minorities they want to put the yoke on all of us be breaking the COuntry so badly that we will be forced to suck at the teat of the Govt.

This is what your party wants, enslavement and power.

My Party has always been the party of Independance, Liberty, and Justice for all!

You claim there is no brainwashing in our schools and media?

Ask any 12 year old who freed the slaves and he/she will most likely say the liberals, or the Democrats.

Republicans were not liberals back then, We wanted the same things we want now. Freedom and Liberty for all people.

The Southern Democrats were just on the wrong side of history and now that their cronies are in charge they have alot of excuses and misinformation, which apparently you are in charge of.

The whole Tea Party thing is just a symbol that grass roots people can recognise and identify with.
The demonstrations are more about spending than taxes becase the paying for the spending hasn't yet occured yet nor has the hyperinflation printing fake money and borrowing will cause.
We are just smart enough (not that it takes a rocket scientist) to know that we WILL be charged for this blundering tomfoolery, And we know it's not too late to scare the Govt. into slowing down or backing off some for fear of losing big in upcoming elections.

By then I hope they havent completely gutted the place.

[goodgod]

as of late, i am switching to independent. my new motto is IN GOD I TRUST--THE REST ARE LIARS!!!

[soulhunter59]

Your ignorance on this subject is astounding.

The Origin of the Republican party was the anti-slavery party.

We fought the Southern Democrats tooth and nail at every single ammendment.

Martin Luther King was a Republican also and that was a long time after Lincoln. By the way, he was a Conservative and he would very strongly be opposed to everything Obama is doing right now.

You are one to talk about propoganda.

You are so full of revisionist history that you don't realize that it is STILL the Democrats who enslave not only the Blacks but all of us.

The Republicans are still the party of civil rights.

The D's continue to want to enslave the minorities, only now they don't use ropes and plows, but entitlements and governmental dependency caused by flawed social engineering.

Only now they aren't content with just minorities they want to put the yoke on all of us be breaking the COuntry so badly that we will be forced to suck at the teat of the Govt.

This is what your party wants, enslavement and power.

My Party has always been the party of Independance, Liberty, and Justice for all!

You claim there is no brainwashing in our schools and media?

Ask any 12 year old who freed the slaves and he/she will most likely say the liberals, or the Democrats.

Republicans were not liberals back then, We wanted the same things we want now. Freedom and Liberty for all people.

The Southern Democrats were just on the wrong side of history and now that their cronies are in charge they have alot of excuses and misinformation, which apparently you are in charge of.

The whole Tea Party thing is just a symbol that grass roots people can recognise and identify with.
The demonstrations are more about spending than taxes becase the paying for the spending hasn't yet occured yet nor has the hyperinflation printing fake money and borrowing will cause.
We are just smart enough (not that it takes a rocket scientist) to know that we WILL be charged for this blundering tomfoolery, And we know it's not too late to scare the Govt. into slowing down or backing off some for fear of losing big in upcoming elections.

By then I hope they havent completely gutted the place.

Well your wrong about one big important thing and that is that the republicans were in fact LIBERAL. Back in the days of the civil war, the confederate states broke from the union because they were against "Big government" and believed more with state rights. Even today, conservatives believe the same thing the confederacy believed in.
As far as the subject of slavery, here are the sides from left wing to right wing. Anti slavery Immedist, Gradualist, pro slavery. The owners of the slaves were RICH WHITE LAND OWNERS who said the crazy liberals want to take our property away. Their argument was that the immediate release of the slaves would cause too much of a shock to our economy. You see conservatives believe in the rights of rich people because what’s good for the rich is good for everyone else eventually.
Oh and just so, you know the Republicans were always against woman's rights even when they switched sides and that in itself is fact no matter how you spin it. When the slaves were first freed, the Republicans wanted male blacks to vote so they could get more votes but they didn't want white women to vote because a southern woman would vote democrat. When the sides changed, it was about the men doing to political stuff while the woman took care of the family.
So the fact is that Lincoln was a liberal who did not believe in the two party system anyway. That's why he had both Republicans and democrats in his cabinet. He was also an Immedist who could not get rid of slavery as fast as he would have liked.

Oh and check your spelling champ.

ammendment

propoganda

Independance

recognise

becase

occured

havent

As a college student studying history I have spent my fair share time of studying in the microfilm lab. In college it takes a lot more than studying from a text book to get an A.

[Databyter]

Well your wrong about one big important thing and that is that the republicans were in fact LIBERAL. Back in the days of the civil war, the confederate states broke from the union because they were against "Big government" and believed more with state rights.The Confederate States WERE Democrats.
Just because they had selfish reasons to want to State rights or to succeed (so they could protect slavery) does not make them the same as Republicans now (who have been and are still against the enslavement of people whether by yoke or by social engineering that makes them dependant on government).

As far as the subject of slavery, here are the sides from left wing to right wing. Anti slavery Immedist, Gradualist, pro slavery. The owners of the slaves were RICH WHITE LAND OWNERS who said the crazy liberals want to take our property away. Their argument was that the immediate release of the slaves would cause too much of a shock to our economy. You see conservatives believe in the rights of rich people because what’s good for the rich is good for everyone else eventually.You're wrong, dead wrong. Tell your social studies teacher to read some books. And by the way What has rich and white have to do with anything? Is that supposed to be a bad thing?
Regardless these Rich White Slave owners were Democrats and were opposed by the Republicans who as always favored Rights for everyone, as long as they weren't into slavery which took away the rights of others.

Oh and just so, you know the Republicans were always against woman's rights even when they switched sides and that in itself is fact no matter how you spin it.So were the Democrats and everyone else at that time.

It is notable that after the party the women created won the vote the overwhelming number of women joined the REPUBLICAN party. This might indicate that the Republicans were liberal for the times on this issue, but the fact is it is not the Republican party who has changed so much over the years.

Rather it is the Democratic party which has run the full gambit of political beliefs.

The Republican party was formed on fairly stable core beliefs which have never changed.

The Democrats are composed of many different factions the cover the board, but are generally threatened by the core beliefs of the Republicans (and in many cases the Founding Fathers and the purpose and intentions of the Constitution as we see today as well as in the past)

So the fact is that Lincoln was a liberal who did not believe in the two party system anyway. That's why he had both Republicans and democrats in his cabinet. He was also an Immedist who could not get rid of slavery as fast as he would have liked.Whether or not he was a fan of parties he was a Republican that being the party that echoed his moral beliefs about civil rights.

[soulhunter59]

The Confederate States WERE Democrats.
Just because they had selfish reasons to want to State rights or to succeed (so they could protect slavery) does not make them the same as Republicans now (who have been and are still against the enslavement of people whether by yoke or by social engineering that makes them dependant on government).

You're wrong, dead wrong. Tell your social studies teacher to read some books. And by the way What has rich and white have to do with anything? Is that supposed to be a bad thing?
Regardless these Rich White Slave owners were Democrats and were opposed by the Republicans who as always favored Rights for everyone, as long as they weren't into slavery which took away the rights of others.

So were the Democrats and everyone else at that time.

It is notable that after the party the women created won the vote the overwhelming number of women joined the REPUBLICAN party. This might indicate that the Republicans were liberal for the times on this issue, but the fact is it is not the Republican party who has changed so much over the years.

Rather it is the Democratic party which has run the full gambit of political beliefs.

The Republican party was formed on fairly stable core beliefs which have never changed.

The Democrats are composed of many different factions the cover the board, but are generally threatened by the core beliefs of the Republicans (and in many cases the Founding Fathers and the purpose and intentions of the Constitution as we see today as well as in the past)

Whether or not he was a fan of parties he was a Republican that being the party that echoed his moral beliefs about civil rights.

I don't know if you realize this but the south is the most conservative part of the United States. In high school almost all my teachers spouted off the same conservative bull crap your saying now. So you are right the conservative positions have not changed at all in the south. Even Hannity agrees with the confederacy about state rights and other conservative radio show hosts talk about a states right to leave the union. Just so you know only 35% of southerners owned slaves. Oh and I forgot to tell you that the country did not start out as a two party system.
Now I'm in college and my professors are the ones that write those history books you are talking about. They get their information from public records and news papers. At my level you do read history books but we now have expand on the limitations of history books. That's why I spend so much time in the micro film lab.
Just so you know Eleanor Roosevelt was one of the key figures in not only the woman's rights moments but also in the anti lynching movement. Also the Feminist movement started many of the issues conservatives are against today. Such as sex education, abortion, safe sex, unions, and free child care. Feminism in general is a very liberal movement that has been demonized by conservatives even today.

[Databyter]

I have to agree with most of what you said in your last.

Scary to think we have had a meeting of the minds.

I'd just like to say that I certainly feel it's worth reminding people about, that the Federal Government was created by the States to serve them and not the other way around.

Most people (present company excepted) don't seem to think of it that way any more much to all of our detriment because Congress tends to be more and more inconsiderate of States rights.

Some States like Texas actually have escape clauses to succede written right into their treaties joining them to the union of the United States. Most however do not.

All of them do have sovereignty though.

I don't think this is just a Conservative belief is it?

Of course we want States rights to be recognised now because many States are not having thier citizens wishes represented by the Federal Government that doesn't seem to represent anything but government anymore.

But are liberals actually disputing this now?

Serious question.

[clearcarbon]

Of course we want States rights to be recognised now because many States are not having thier citizens wishes represented by the Federal Government that doesn't seem to represent anything but government anymore....


The Federal "one size fits all philosophy" isn't very realistic.
I don't expect electric cars to be very popular in Alaska,
nor do CFLs work well in the cold.



.

[soulhunter59]

I have to agree with most of what you said in your last.

Scary to think we have had a meeting of the minds.

I'd just like to say that I certainly feel it's worth reminding people about, that the Federal Government was created by the States to serve them and not the other way around.

Most people (present company excepted) don't seem to think of it that way any more much to all of our detriment because Congress tends to be more and more inconsiderate of States rights.

Some States like Texas actually have escape clauses to succede written right into their treaties joining them to the union of the United States. Most however do not.

All of them do have sovereignty though.

I don't think this is just a Conservative belief is it?

Of course we want States rights to be recognised now because many States are not having thier citizens wishes represented by the Federal Government that doesn't seem to represent anything but government anymore.

But are liberals actually disputing this now?

Serious question.

Yes, the states do have rights up to a point but that's why we have federal law. No state can make it illegal to have an abortion outside the federal time lines. There is a gap however, that allows each state to decide when it is no longer OK to have an abortion.

Obama has no real interest in changing state rights such as these nor is this the main reason why conservatives are upset with him right now. They are more upset with his tax increases but Obama does have the right to change the federal taxes. George Washington stopped rebellions, who protested the same things conservatives are protesting now. The only difference is that none of the tea parties tarred and feathered their tax collector. The tea parties in no way represent the Boston tea party by any stretch of the imagination. The Conservatives are also criticizing Obama's actions to protect the people from big businessmen who only care about their own pockets.

As far as the military is concerned, he actually trusts the military witch Bush never did. Bush would fire anyone that didn't tell him what he wanted to hear and it caused the Iraqi invasion to become a complete disaster. Obama is also cutting a few worthless military projects such as the production of jet on jet fighters. None of our enemies has an air force so why do we need fighters. He did however expand the military budget by 4%.

I know that I went a little off topic but I wanted to set a few other things strait.